We've got super powered telescopes that can see great detail at huge distances. If there has been a landing and the stuff left up there then surely it can be seen? Just publish some images independently and the argument is closed. FWIW I believe they're real.
I read somewhere that there was about 400,000 folk employed for the moon landing… it’s a lot of people to keep quiet
It's been done a couple of times I'm sure, pictures taken by craft orbiting the moon. Also several countries and organisations tracked the apollo craft to the moon. If it was faked the Russians would have been all over it.
This is one that I'm 100% fully sure about. So many people put so much effort into that project. The amount of money spent was ridiculous. In my opinion it still stands as the absolute pinnacle of human achievement. Imagine what we could achieve if we applied that kind of effort to eradicating poverty, or disease, or providing the whole world with clean water or energy. The moon landings prove comprehensively that humanity can do fantastic things, but also, sadly, that for whatever reason we don't always want to. Maybe it's just that we need the right kind of war.
There are pictures of the landing sites - taken by orbiting satellites. Unless they've been faked too in this never ending conspiracy. https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-sites.html
I love a good mystery/conspiracy, imo: - Moon landing = 100% happened - UPAs / UFOs = 100% real and the US military have the proof - JFK = 100% an internal assassination, too many things just don't add up, he had to be removed to maintain the status quo - Loch Ness Monster = 0% true. Mind you it's one of the most foreboding and atmospheric places in the UK, love visiting there
Also reflective material left on the moon by the apollo missions which we can fire lazers at and record the signal bouncing back.
ironically the modern day myth of the Loch Ness monster was started by a sighting in 1933 by our very own George Spicer.