forest green rovers

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board' started by manicminergb, Dec 7, 2023.

  1. man

    manicminergb Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2017
    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    they have been told to replay their fa cup match against scarborough for playing an illigal player- wtf
    we get banned but ofc we are barnsley
     
    Austiniho and Stephen Dawson like this.
  2. matoakwell

    matoakwell Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2014
    Messages:
    1,795
    Likes Received:
    2,376
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    It's nothing to do with "being Barnsley". We aren't getting "picked on"

    The club didn't appeal so what option did the FA have?

    Forest Green were also charged with a different offence than we were (dunno if that made it easier to appeal).
     
  3. Tru

    TrueRed92 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2016
    Messages:
    2,564
    Likes Received:
    1,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Barnsley
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    Barnsley FC did appeal.
     
  4. Tyk

    Tyketical Masterstroke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2011
    Messages:
    9,824
    Likes Received:
    13,248
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Dry buumer
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    No, they didn't.
     
  5. matoakwell

    matoakwell Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2014
    Messages:
    1,795
    Likes Received:
    2,376
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Nope
     
  6. Tru

    TrueRed92 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2016
    Messages:
    2,564
    Likes Received:
    1,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Barnsley
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    Did neither of you watch the fan forum video?
     
  7. rin

    ringo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2018
    Messages:
    2,285
    Likes Received:
    1,173
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Forest green didn't appeal apparently they didn't even tell the FA what they had done like Barnsley did . Please give up protecting the FA and the EFL they are inconsistent at the very best but probably corrupt as well
     
    Austiniho likes this.
  8. Tyk

    Tyketical Masterstroke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2011
    Messages:
    9,824
    Likes Received:
    13,248
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Dry buumer
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    What, the one where Neerav says we didn't appeal? Yes.
     
    TitusMagee likes this.
  9. Tru

    TrueRed92 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2016
    Messages:
    2,564
    Likes Received:
    1,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Barnsley
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2023
  10. Slightly Balding

    Slightly Balding Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2021
    Messages:
    898
    Likes Received:
    1,147
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cudworth
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Wrong
     
    TrueRed92 likes this.
  11. Tru

    TrueRed92 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2016
    Messages:
    2,564
    Likes Received:
    1,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Barnsley
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    41 minutes and 25 seconds into the fan forum video you will hear it very clear from Neerav's mouth that Barnsley FC appealed to the FA
     
    RedInBlackrod likes this.
  12. Slightly Balding

    Slightly Balding Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2021
    Messages:
    898
    Likes Received:
    1,147
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cudworth
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    It appears we deliberately allowed ourselves to be expelled. My understanding is that the FA were extremely surprised as it's 'unheard of'for clubs to neither appeal nor request a personal hearing.

    BARNSLEY'S OVERSIGHT RAISES EYEBROWS
    Barnsley’s failure to request a personal hearing after being charged with fielding an ineligible player in their FA Cup first-round replay against Horsham this month raised eyebrows at the FA.


    The League One club simply admitted the charge in a written response without taking the opportunity to defend themselves in person, and were kicked out of the competition as a result.
     
  13. thetykester

    thetykester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2016
    Messages:
    11,353
    Likes Received:
    10,196
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Part time cleaner
    Location:
    T'Well
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Sounds to me like we DID appeal.
     
    RedInBlackrod and TrueRed92 like this.
  14. Tru

    TrueRed92 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2016
    Messages:
    2,564
    Likes Received:
    1,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Barnsley
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    Thank you.. someone who isn't making me out to be insane.
     
    thetykester and 55&counting like this.
  15. Sco

    Scoff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2011
    Messages:
    9,221
    Likes Received:
    7,963
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    The interface between business and technology
    Location:
    Brampton by the Sea
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    As I've said in the other thread, we should have been expelled - but so also should FGR. No offence to them at all, but they played an ineligible player. Both of us should be out of the cup as a result.
     
    55&counting likes this.
  16. TonyTyke

    TonyTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    6,035
    Likes Received:
    3,263
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I don't really see what an appeal would have done for us. We were in the wrong, simple as that.

    I've not followed the FGR incident closely, even though it was a different rule, but a very similar rule, I'm not really sure why they had grounds to appeal, and win their appeal?
     
  17. Fon

    Fonzie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2012
    Messages:
    9,328
    Likes Received:
    15,937
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    He says "we appealed our position" at the place you state - then about 30 seconds later says that we didn't see any point in appealing.

    To me, the "appealed our position" bit is just a turn of phrase.

    We clearly didn't officially appeal, as we would have seen the results of said appeal positively or negatively.
     
  18. 55&counting

    55&counting Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2015
    Messages:
    4,314
    Likes Received:
    6,709
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Avid Vic & Bob fan.
    Location:
    Ardsley
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    he actually does say "we appealed obviously".
    that's clear.
     
    TrueRed92 likes this.
  19. Tyk

    Tyketical Masterstroke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2011
    Messages:
    9,824
    Likes Received:
    13,248
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Dry buumer
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Yes, I agree that he says "we appealed our position" but then he clearly corrects himself and clarifies 30 seconds later, literally in the same monologue, he explicitly says that we "didn't see any point in appealing" and it's clear from all the stuff in the national press that we didn't appeal.

    I get that it's confusing as what he says is clear as mud (I actually joked about it in the FA Cup thread) but we definitely haven't *formally* appealed. All we've done is stated our case at the initial point when the error became apparent and then we've compounded it by "not seeing the point" in Neerav's words of the appeal.

    Which is nearly as daft as when Cryne said "we didn't know how good John Stones was"
     
  20. Slightly Balding

    Slightly Balding Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2021
    Messages:
    898
    Likes Received:
    1,147
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cudworth
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    What he means is they sent a letter in to answer the charge. There is a big difference in that and appealing. What happens exactly is this:
    1. The FA issue a charge and give a player/club a set number of days to reply. In that reply they admit or deny the charge and tick the box choosing which way they want it dealing with - either a paper hearing (where the club does not attend and the panel simply decide on the basis of the letter they sent in) or by ticking the box saying they want a personal hearing ( many of which are now done by zoom so they don't even have to leave the ground). In the latter they can verbally state their case. The panel then decide on penalty. BFC should have asked for the latter personal gearing but they didn't.
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2023
    RedInBlackrod likes this.

Share This Page