forest green rovers

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board' started by manicminergb, Dec 7, 2023.

Page 2 of 2
  1. Slightly Balding

    Slightly Balding Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2021
    Messages:
    899
    Likes Received:
    1,148
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cudworth
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Once the penalty is issued it is AT THAT POINT that they can appeal. They did not do this. They just accepted the penalty of being booted out. Once again any appeal can be done in person by zoom, or on paper. It is ALWAYS beneficial to have the persinal hearing and had they appeal led as outlined above in a personal hearing they would have prob got a replay.
     
    Slightly Balding, Dec 7, 2023
    #21
    Connor, Stephen Dawson and Tyketical Masterstroke like this.
  2. Barnsley Chopin

    Barnsley Chopin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2012
    Messages:
    2,911
    Likes Received:
    2,410
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Egghead
    Location:
    WOMBWELL
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Spectemur Agendo - let us be judged by our acts. What an absolute shambles BFC is.
     
    Barnsley Chopin, Dec 7, 2023
    #22
    Stephen Dawson likes this.
  3. Jay

    Jay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    43,089
    Likes Received:
    31,465
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    On Sofa
    Style:
    Barnsley
    We appealed, obviously, and by appealed I mean we didn't appeal, and by obviously I mean it was Crystal Clear, Staring Us Straight In The Face Obvious that we should have appealed to everyone else, but unfortunately not to us. We also admitted to starting the Great Fire of London and being Jack The Ripper.
     
    Jay, Dec 7, 2023
    #23
    Oakwell Calling, TrueRed92, Tyketical Masterstroke and 4 others like this.
  4. rin

    ringo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2018
    Messages:
    2,285
    Likes Received:
    1,173
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I heard Neerav, say after reporting it to the FA, they reported it to the Horsham owner who apparently asked for a replay but the FA rejected that... but they have granted it to Forest Green, consistancy non existent
     
    ringo, Dec 7, 2023
    #24
    Stephen Dawson and TrueRed92 like this.
  5. Tru

    TrueRed92 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2016
    Messages:
    2,564
    Likes Received:
    1,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Barnsley
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    Anyway, 3 match ban to Cameron McGeehan.
     
    TrueRed92, Dec 7, 2023
    #25
    anstonred, 55&counting and Stephen Dawson like this.
  6. Skryptic

    Skryptic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2015
    Messages:
    3,175
    Likes Received:
    3,406
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Skryptic, Dec 7, 2023
    #26
    TrueRed92 likes this.
  7. tosh

    tosh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Messages:
    6,118
    Likes Received:
    3,010
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    North Sea
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    If the facts stated in the clubs letter and or the facts stated in a personal hearing are the same, then surely the outcome should be the same. I appreciate that cross examination can take place in the personal hearing scenario but then can the facts then be classed as the same. There is no guarantee that the outcome would have been different if the club had appealed. I would have thought that the FA would use expulsion for a worst case scenario such as a team playing a real ringer and not a ringer by a technicality.
     
    tosh, Dec 7, 2023
    #27
  8. Fon

    Fonzie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2012
    Messages:
    9,330
    Likes Received:
    15,941
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Fonzie, Dec 7, 2023
    #28
  9. MexboroughTyke

    MexboroughTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,543
    Likes Received:
    3,886
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    Barnsley - breached rule 103 & fielded an unregistered player. Disqualified.

    FGR - breached rule 109 & fielded a registered loan player but without permission to play from parent club. Re-play tie.
     
    MexboroughTyke, Dec 7, 2023
    #29
  10. Sim

    Simon De Montforte Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    5,312
    Likes Received:
    4,751
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Marsh was registered, he was ineligible because he wasn't available to play in the.home fixture.
    Incidentally, if a player is ineligible for the home fixture due to being suspended, does that rule him out of the replay even if he's served his suspension? The rule apparently states that if a player is ineligible for the original tie, he can't play in the replay
     
    Simon De Montforte, Dec 7, 2023
    #30
  11. MexboroughTyke

    MexboroughTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,543
    Likes Received:
    3,886
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    That was taken from a tweet, highlighting the differences in rule breaches.
     
    MexboroughTyke, Dec 7, 2023
    #31
  12. Baldrick

    Baldrick Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    1,148
    Likes Received:
    1,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Dunny-on-the-Wold
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    As I understand it if he is suspended for the initial tie he can play in the replay if the suspension is completed as he was registered with us at the time of the first tie (just suspended).
    Marsh was still registered at York on loan when the first tie was played.
     
    Baldrick, Dec 7, 2023
    #32
    Simon De Montforte likes this.
  13. Sco

    Scoff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2011
    Messages:
    9,221
    Likes Received:
    7,963
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    The interface between business and technology
    Location:
    Brampton by the Sea
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    From reading an article on this earlier, it appears that the FA didn't inform FGR that the player had (or didn't have) permission from the parent club to play. So it may have been a mistake at the FA rather than the club. Which could explain the different punishments.
     
    Scoff, Dec 8, 2023
    #33
  14. Baldrick

    Baldrick Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    1,148
    Likes Received:
    1,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Dunny-on-the-Wold
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    It appears that Forest Green had permission for him to play but didn't inform the FA.
    Screenshot_20231208_115315_Chrome.jpg
     
    Baldrick, Dec 8, 2023
    #34
    Scoff likes this.
Page 2 of 2

Share This Page