£250 000 gets you dinner with the PM apparently.......

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by 'thereev', Mar 26, 2012.

  1. 'thereev'

    'thereev' Banned Idiot

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2011
    Messages:
    9,047
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Company Director
    Location:
    Monte Carlo
    .... and a chance to influence party policy.

    What gets me is that people think this doesn't go off. Why else would anyone put a quarter of a million into a party for no return. It aint just the tories either ...they're all at it probably or else they wouldn't get funding.

    All bent i am afraid..............

    hth

    .
     
  2. Dys

    Dyson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2005
    Messages:
    14,641
    Likes Received:
    5,133
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tarn centre
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Key difference with Labour is that the vast majority of their funding comes from the Trade Unions, democratic and elected bodies who represent their members. Not a bloke with a few quid who wants a trade levy to help him sell electrical resistors.
     
  3. 'thereev'

    'thereev' Banned Idiot

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2011
    Messages:
    9,047
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Company Director
    Location:
    Monte Carlo
    Agreed but the unions also have a large say in the running of the labour party........ Can't get away from the fact that if you pay enough money into something, you more often than not get your 'moneys worth' so to speak.

    hth
     
  4. MarioKempes

    MarioKempes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2008
    Messages:
    40,155
    Likes Received:
    7,178
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Project Manager
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Financial influence at the top of government is wrong whether its a rich businessman or a trade union. The government is elected to server the county and not the interests of those who can afford it.
     
  5. EastStander

    EastStander Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    29,883
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Upper tier, Gangway 11
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Said for years that there should be central funding for political parties.
     
  6. Dys

    Dyson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2005
    Messages:
    14,641
    Likes Received:
    5,133
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tarn centre
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I agree entirely, but until you've got a system where political parties are funded by the state/tax payer surely a party being funded by a democratically elected body representing millions is the least worst of all the options?

    With the Trade Union system you're not representing those that can afford it, you're representing the mass of ordinary fowk.
     
  7. Redstar

    Redstar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    26,953
    Likes Received:
    2,050
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Fidel's Bedside
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Correct. There is a million miles of difference between the two.
     
  8. Ext

    Extremely Northern Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2011
    Messages:
    11,753
    Likes Received:
    1,949
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Professional Northerner.
    Location:
    Preparing for the 4th division
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    The only difference here is who's in power.

    If Unions, bankers, businessmen, druids, whoever want to give a political party money in the hope of influencing policy prior to an election then fine - at election time the voters can decide if they like those policies.

    Once in power however, the rules should change - Blair did it, Cameron's doing it - money influencing the actions of the elected Govt - we don't get a say in that, and Parliament probably won't either. Wrong.
     
  9. Wat

    Watcher_Of_The_Skies Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2011
    Messages:
    9,604
    Likes Received:
    5,498
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Leeds
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Oligarchy is the word. Democracy is a sham.
     
  10. Gaz

    Gaz Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    5,210
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    No idea. Definitely not at work, though. Honest.
    Home Page:
    As if. What? Good old, honest, Call Me Dave? No way. I'm shocked. No, really.
     

Share This Page