£266k on agents. 4th highest in the league

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by SuperTyke, Feb 27, 2009.

  1. Sup

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    56,268
    Likes Received:
    30,555
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    So don't anyone go telling me that barnsley cant compete with the championship on money if they CHOOSE to.
     
  2. Spa

    Spartacus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    12,634
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Barnsley, England, United Kingdom, 103126909727190
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    We've probably signed more players! nt
     
  3. Sup

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    56,268
    Likes Received:
    30,555
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Which is hard to do if you're as skint as it is made out we are

    The fact that while the top teams in the league have spent peanuts on agents fee's yet barnsley have blown over a quarter of a million just to agents and are for the third year in a row (thanks simon) in a relegation fight shows to me that our policy on transfers is all wrong.

    I wonder if our figures are so high because we seem to loan someone once a week. No transfer fee but money wasted on agents every time we bring in a teale, rigters or whaley
     
  4. oss

    ossettred Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    3,530
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    somewhere confused
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    RE: Which is hard to do if you're as skint as it is made out we are

    Maybe its because we don't have a board with enough knowledge about signing players.
     
  5. Spa

    Spartacus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    12,634
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Barnsley, England, United Kingdom, 103126909727190
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Ten other clubs spent 200k+

    Derby spent 3 times the amount, and numerous clubs have spent more over the longer period.
    </p>

    Only 7 paid less than 100k and only the pigs spent &quot;peanuts&quot; which is no surprise since they've hardly made a signing and haven't a pot to piss in. </p>

    Depends on type of transfers I suppose. Cant imagine how QPR only managed to fork out 40k..some payments may not be transparent? May depend on how certain players remunerate their agents?? Championship </p>

    Barnsley 7 4 2 5 18 266,200 161,920 </p>

    Birmingham City 8 4 3 4 19 425,000 N/A </p>

    Blackpool 13 3 2 6 24 72,000 0 Bristol City 7 9 1 1 18 70,000 250,300</p>

    Burnley 10 2 1 1 14 237,000 214,900 </p>

    Cardiff City 12 6 1 5 24 152,500 54,000 </p>

    Charlton Athletic 7 3 4 10 24 231,000 782,305 </p>

    Coventry City 8 0 0 1 9 250,000 275,000 </p>

    Crystal Palace 21 6 2 4 33 248,140 35,000 </p>

    Derby County 24 5 5 4 38 717,000 N/A </p>

    Doncaster Rovers 12 16 1 5 34 116,000 50,500 </p>

    Ipswich Town 10 6 1 2 19 113,200 125,000 </p>

    Norwich City 14 1 0 6 21 490,000 155,200 </p>

    Nottingham Forest 10 11 4 10 35 124,000 76,100 </p>

    Plymouth Argyle 16 5 2 5 28 144,000 83,000 </p>

    Preston North End 10 4 1 4 19 212,501 230,000 </p>

    Queens Park Rangers 16 1 4 6 27 40,290 211,000 </p>

    Reading 12 9 1 6 28 205,386 N/A </p>

    Sheffield United 10 1 4 7 22 125,000 400,000 </p>

    Sheffield Wednesday 3 5 0 6 14 5,000 190,300 </p>

    Southampton 17 4 3 3 27 252,674 312,950 </p>

    Swansea City 10 11 1 9 31 85,000 31,665 </p>

    Watford 11 1 5 7 24 84,994 169,440 </p>

    Wolves 14 5 3 6 28 142,150 142,600 </p>

    Division Total 282 122 51 123 578 4,809,035 FOR THE PERIOD OF 1 JULY 2008 TO 31 DECEMBER 2008 </p>

    Explanatory Notes: 1 The amounts disclosed include all guaranteed payments due to an agent arising out of player transactions entered into during the reporting period, even if such payments may include instalments payable outside of the reporting period. 2 The amounts disclosed do not include: a any payments made during the reporting period that relate to transactions completed before 1st July 2008; and b any contingent payments based on future events, e.g promotion, retention of divisional status, player appearances, etc.</p>
     

Share This Page