RE: who? The player.</p> Apparently they're all unreasonable. You'd think they'd play for nothing wouldn't you?</p>
hmmm, he said it previously, is that man-u wanted guaranteed 1st team games, guaranteed, and AR couldnt guarantee that, but GS said, that the loanee was available for activation at any time (once they agreed to the guarantee) - i guess thats AR's decision.
I heard... All hes waiting for is Ritchie to say YES... GS will not approach ManUre until such a time...
i have a feeling that this guy would be fetched in to fill Howard or togwells boots should they get injured. I doubt we will see them otherwise. What worries me is again we have this from the chairman: "hes a utility player, we can fecth him in anytime we like" and this from the manager: "hes a midfielder and Man Utd want us to guarantee him first team football!" once again 2 different viewpoints.
RE: 2 different view points It was Gordon Shepherd that told me on friday that the Man United player was a midfielder and that Alex Feguson wanted a guarantee of first team football for him. Andy Ritchie, understandably, didn't want to drop Togwell or Howard. </p> Gordon also said that himself and the club scouts continue to put suggestions for players to AR. AR was following up on one of these on Friday but I guess these enquiries happen all the time. </p>
Yep, Shepherd should keep his mouth shut about the 'team'/players side of things. He's running the club, maybe he's forgot that he's employed a manager to take care of the players and football bit! He aint got a clue.