A lot of you have suggested we were too negative yesterday (and rightly so) but what should he have done differently? Change a team that had a good win at Charlton? Play proschwitz (who has been anonymous in recent games) Play Mellis (see above) Play McCourt (see above and double it) We were poor yesterday but I'm not sure Danny has any other options unless I'm missing something...........
what we should do is play the ball on the floor,through the middle, not 30 feet in the air to O`Grady who sometimes gets a head on it sometimes he doesn`t but the ball always ends up going to the other side,the stile of play is HORRIBLE, Leeds were there for the taking they are a poor side it needed the ball playing around them,one two`s,
5 in midfield dunt work at home so play 2 up and hope Proschwitz does well. Wilson brought him here by the way.
I think that in hindsight Danny might regret releasing Dagnall and Scotland. Proswitcz has no allegiance to us and has been a big disappointment, as has Pederson, and we seem very short of options up front. In the few games I've seen we're over reliant on COG to receive a ball played at chest height from deep, and when he does get it under control there are no runners coming through in support from midfield. Danny must take responsibility for some of the poor tactics.
We haven't got 2 strikers :-( hope Nick does well - he's a professional footballer getting a decent salary - if I was employed on that basis in the classroom tthen I wouldn't last long
Footballers only have to be seen to be making an effort. They don't have to be any good at their jobs because there will always be someone better or on more money.
I'm not asking Danny to be sacked but i want him to see that ONE striker who likes to go out on the wing. I suppose we'll have to deal with it.
I imagine Wilson knows only too well the shortcomings of this team. He tried Pedersen with O'Grady and it seemed to work, but Pedersen is made of glass and so is RNL (also worked) Proschwitz did ok in his first few games so don't know why he's gone downhill - probably better from the start in O'Grady's role Even tried Cywka or Mellis off the striker and that definitely didn't work either No other strikers left! Plain and simple
Yes COMING OFF THE BENCH at a League 2 side !!! Not good enough to start even for a league 2 side ! Yet some see him as a almost Godlike !! I think his loan will help him become a better player, but he is not up to Championship standard yet, well not consistantly anyway. I do believe he could not be any worse than what we have got at the moment though, but at least we can ship out those 2 . Playing Rose at this moment could do damage to him and his confidence, rather than having no pressure at Bury and thriving ! Just my opinion and i know plenty disagree.
Like I said was another option. Dont tell me he would have done any worse than Pederson or Proswich. They have had enough chances, yet danny sends Rose to Bury without giving him a chance. We need a player on the pith who will get into the box while our other striker has gone walkabout. I dont think he was the saviour, personally would had preferd we kept Dagnall. but we didn't and we shouldn't have sent Rose to Bury with so little other options up front
When he went we had RNL, Pedersen, Nick etc. Wilson also signed Rose onto a long term contract so he clearly rates him .
RNL & Pederson couldn't be relied upon to play 2 games without being injured and Nick is fecking useless or cant be bothered. Would rather have played Rose than any of them