Academy Set for Shake Up in New Year - another barns1ey story

Another one from stokesy that is not on official site? He seems to be getting all the exclusive scoops.
</p>

http://www.BarnsleyFC.co.uk/bfc/story_template.php?seqno=38
</p>

Academy Set for Shake Up in New Year</p>

The Reds are looking to reorganise the Academy set up in the new year to improve the production line for new players. It is clear that Barnsley lost the best of its kids in the Administration period and so there has been a gap in the talent coming through. </p>

Reuben Noble-Lazarus, Jamil Adam and Jacob Butterfield are the best that have come through in recent years. It is expected that Simon Davey will take a closer involvement in future. </p>

At present, the Academy runs autonomously.</p>

</p>

 

Why are your links going to the official site? nt

nt

 

nevermind

</p>

 

Looks like links to that site are banned.

The bbs is automatically changing anything from football barnsley to barnsleyfc so I can't post the exact link.</p>

Should be this (but without a space between football and barnsley:</p>

http://www.football barnsley.co.uk/story_template.php?seqno=38
</p>

 

RE: I'll regret getting involved here but

Fair enough, I posted the contents of the story, which was my point any way. I don't care about his site, but he is certainly getting some inside info, which isn't being posted on the official site.

 

Is it because you wouldn't stop whinging at Stokes? nt

 

Yes Jonno, that's right

I whinged at Stokes which freakily caused any attempt to type in the address of his website to instead go to the official site.

Try typing in Simon Davey, i've complained about him a few times so you'll notice that if you type his name in it puts up Neil Redfearn instead.

 

RE: Yes Jonno, that's right

You don't whinge at every single post Simon Davey makes though... Just every decision.

 

I think you should discuss them

 

Same here!

It's SuperTyke's fault innit?

 

It's a shame his links are banned. Anywhere that gives us another source to our club, is surely a good thing.

 

Whatever the reason I accept it cause

sometimes thats the best thing to do. We have a board run by our admin and if they think something needs banning then so be it, bugger having a drawn out debate over BBs policy. if you dont like it then lump it or start your own board.....

 

And there my friends is the argument for totalitarianism

 

He does well to get stories the official website seemingly doesn't.

 

Maybe he sees things before they happen like his grandma Doris

 

I think we can safely say...

</p>

....we're all supposed to be stupid.</p>

 

TERMS OF USAGE.

Any messages or information you post to the forum become the sole property of the site operator and may or may not be displayed, at the sole discretion of the site operator. The posting of copyrighted or illegal material is prohibited-- you must obey all applicable local laws, including those of the server and site owner. You may not post information invasive of another's personal privacy rights, harrasment, libelous, or information of a confidential or copyrighted nature.

This forum is provided as a public service and your usage of this service may be terminated at any time by the site operator without prior notice. Information submitted to the system should not be considered confidential or private and may be revealed as part of normal system operations. No warranty of service is implied.

If you have further questions, you must contact the site operator before continuing. By submitting this form, you acknowlege that you understand and agree to these conditions.

Everyone agreed to this when registering. Not saying i support the decision or otherwise.

 

Where does banning a non offensive & public interest website fall into those T's & C's?

 

right here

"Any messages or information you post to the forum become the sole property of the site operator and may or may not be displayed, at the sole discretion of the site operator."