Alright here's a real question far more important than the rest..

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by ark104, Nov 21, 2008.

  1. ark

    ark104 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2007
    Messages:
    1,196
    Likes Received:
    0
    ark104, Nov 21, 2008
    #1
  2. Poet

    Poet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Messages:
    7,760
    Likes Received:
    188
    Location:
    Royston, Barnsley.
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    NO! Fair enough, if they have water retention. However, cake retention is a definite no! nt
     
    Poet, Nov 21, 2008
    #2
  3. M1 Tyke

    M1 Tyke New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    1,926
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    The only Tory in the village
    Location:
    Somewhere between Dirty Leeds and That London
    RE: NO! Fair enough, if they have water retention. However, cake retention is a definite no! nt

    Should thin people get extra baggage allowance then?

    Should airlines opperate a net Passenger weight and include all baggage and personal timberage.



    You're a fatist anyway
     
    M1 Tyke, Nov 21, 2008
    #3
  4. andytyke

    andytyke Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    13,098
    Likes Received:
    2,885
    Location:
    Featherstone
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    RE: NO! Fair enough, if they have water retention. However, cake retention is a definite no! nt

    so i could be sat next to some fat naked bloke/women who only just made the weight next time i fly
     
    andytyke, Nov 21, 2008
    #4

Share This Page