most of them are being sensible but some of the comments make the ones they had on about about Hume appear rational!
Yes I had a good read of Blunts mad as we were offline I particularly liked those that thought it was because he was a blunt that he was found guilty Havent really followed the Evans case but must admit to being a bit baffled that he was guilty and the other guy innocent when both admitted having a go on her. I'd have expected both to get the same verdict. I was tempted to go on and suggest that as they were playing a guy who was out on bail and had been found guilty - all the goals he scored whilst out on bail should be discounted and results modified accordingly - but couldnt be arsed to register