That's what the commentator said at first too. "And it's HASSEEEELLL!!! Great goal by Hayes!!!" hmm... ne1 gt da hilites?
Wasn't any doubt.. Hayes headed in from 4 yards after Hassell's header went back across the face of goal. Hayes was improved after his goal (not difficult, mind) but the ball never once stuck up there after he went off. Carbon MotM by a mile, Tonge and Devaney were good too. Flinders had a bit of a mare. Richards worked hard but lacks ability, Hayes struggled for confidence but scored his only chance of the game. Jarman and Wroe may aswell have stayed sat on the bench and left us to play with nine when they came on.
Oh And Jarman should have been sent off. And before people jump on me here, I'm not for a second saying Hayes played well. Better than Richards, and his touch was good, but he wasn't good. But he did score and it has been given to him.
RE: Wasn't any doubt.. Tonge played OK, but perhaps stayed on a little bit too long (after he was on the end of a pretty strong challenge from Bridge-Wilkinson). Wroe did OK when he came on. He actually made one or two forward runs from midfield (something I didn't really feel Tonge or Burns did enough of).
RE: Wasn't any doubt.. They gave the goal out v Rotherham 2 Watt when it hit Hayes last!!! Still says it's Watt's goal as well!!
RE: Wasn't any doubt.. Hayes is crap but no problem we'll give him a goal and hide and all' Jesus. Let's mek a goal up for him, even if somebody else scores, let's give it to Hayes so he can get a goal. B*ll*cks! Get Rid ASAP Worst 2 strikers up front in all my time watching the Reds from the Sixties.