not worth going to then? what about vegas and new york? trying to plan a honeymoon. have you been to dubai too - any good?! cheers
RE: not worth going to then? Beverley Hills boring, Santa Monica about best place in LA. Las Vegas brilliant for a lads holiday. New York loads to do and see and worth going but only for 3 or 4 nights.
RE: not worth going to then? Agree with Santa Monica and Vegas. San Francisco and Santa Barbara good for honeymoon stuff.
RE: not worth going to then? not been to dubai , vegas is fantastic as in New York, Beverley hills would only be OK for acouple of days
RE: not worth going to then? Westwood is the place to go in LA its where UCLA is so plenty of nightlife and a commuateble distance to the like of Hollywood, Beverley Hills, the coast etc etc
Load of ballax. The nearest you've been to those places is watching 'Knots Landing' on lunchtime tofu TV. Billy Liar bums on fire dangling on a telephone wire with Martin Offiah on a funeral pyre with Mariah ... Carey.
Yes 2004. Visited for half a day whilst on a three day stay in LA. LA well worth including in a US tour - not as much fun as NYC but you can easily make 3-4 days of entertainment (including Universal Studios for one of them).
Yeah I've been a couple of times - was there for a day last month. There's certainly a few days entertainment to be had in LA but personally I had a better time in Las Vegas and New York.
RE: not worth going to then? Recommend NY for a few days, Washington DC, Boston, Chicago - would have said New Orleans but depends how long before they get back on their feet. Depends what you look for - if you like museums then DC and Chicago inparticularly are both very good. Been to Southern California - close to Long Beach and the whole area is just a sprawl - wouldn't go back really unless I was visiting friends as I was then.