Anyone still think Davey is the man for the job?

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by properboitellthi, Oct 18, 2008.

  1. pro

    properboitellthi Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2008
    Messages:
    375
    Likes Received:
    10
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    That was fooking shocking.

    Worst performance I've seen in a long time.
     
  2. O.W.T.

    O.W.T. New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,046
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nearly as bad as Cardiff at home nt
     
  3. mex

    mexboro big un New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    631
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    TARN
    time to go /poo
     
  4. Brush

    Brush Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,290
    Likes Received:
    16,356
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Ex-IT professional
    Location:
    Swadlincote, South Derbyshire
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    At least he made substitutions early enough to make a difference this time. nt
     
  5. Cud

    CudTyke New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,571
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    East Stand Lower
    Yes he is

    Shocking? we played well in patches, bad ref, not getting the rub of the green, star player had a mare - how the **** is that the managers fault you slack lovely person?
     
  6. *Windy

    *Windy Banned Idiot

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2007
    Messages:
    8,416
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes, if the job is to get us relegated. nt
     
  7. *Windy

    *Windy Banned Idiot

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2007
    Messages:
    8,416
    Likes Received:
    0
    Heh heh. You had me for a minute there. nt
     
  8. SuperTyke

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    55,830
    Likes Received:
    29,975
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    bad referee I agree

    How he let Muller stay on the pitch after he took out their striker who was through on goal is beyond me. Some might say that he was going away from goal but he was taking evasive action to get around a reckless dive at his feet. last man, no keeper between him and the goal. red card.
     
  9. SuperTyke

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    55,830
    Likes Received:
    29,975
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    he did what he always does

    we're behind so he puts three strikers on. it's worked once in two years that I can remember.
     
  10. EastStander

    EastStander Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    29,883
    Likes Received:
    24
    Location:
    Upper tier, Gangway 11
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I've seen players sent off for that

    but

    1. The attacker pushed the ball away from goal first and a defender was getting back.
    2. The only contact from the keepr was the attacker catching Muller's arm as he jumped over him, it wasn't a clear cut bringing down of the player.

    I thought the ref got it right there.

    However, look at the attack we had just proior to that when header straight at their keeper.....clear push n teh back of our forward.
     
  11. den

    denno New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,164
    Likes Received:
    0
    it was souza that was taken out by their player in the box, and later on fossie was manhandles to the ground, straight in front of the useless ref who gave them the free kick!!!!!!!!!
    even the commentators said it should have been the other way, but we were pretty usless and overun in midfield, how many times have we seen that in the last couple of years??????
     
  12. SuperTyke

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    55,830
    Likes Received:
    29,975
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    foster wasnt manhandled to the ground

    BOTH players were pulling and pushing each other and foster pulled their player on top of him while he was pushing him down it wasn't a foul in either direction as both players were at fault.

    More specifically, it wasn't a foul because the pulling and pushing started before the free kick was taken and was shown on sky at the time but the commentators missed it until the replay.
     
  13. SuperTyke

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    55,830
    Likes Received:
    29,975
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    the defender was getting back but he wasn't back and whether the player was on the floor when he was he was brought down by the last man or whether he was jumping when the last man brought him down is irrelevant, he was still taken down by the last player and denied an obvious goalscoring opportunity (no keeper and no defenders in front of him) so it was a red.

    At the other end we still got a shot off, shame our ***** strikers don't know how to hit the net.
     
  14. Spe

    Spectemur Agendo New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Messages:
    1,698
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Tarn
    2 wins from 11 Davey Out before its too late.... nt
     
  15. Gaz

    Gaz Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    5,210
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    No idea. Definitely not at work, though. Honest.
    We were lucky.

    The ref bottled making a big decision in front of the cameras. "Getting back" doesn't count as "back" - the striker still had two yards on our last man, and regardless of the type of contact, there was definite contact. He may have pushed the ball slightly away from goal but it was minimal - it's not as though he was heading towards the corner flag or anything. A couple of strides he'd have caught up with the ball and knocked it in with yards to spare. Luckily he made the most of the contact, and that may have helped our cause, but it was a definite sending off.
     
  16. Gaz

    Gaz Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    5,210
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    No idea. Definitely not at work, though. Honest.
    Selective hearing there mate.

    The commentators said that it was almost impossible to decide who was manhandling who so couldn't see how the ref came to such a clear cut decision, but I can't remember anyone saying it was a foul on Foster.
     
  17. Farnham_Red

    Farnham_Red Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    34,505
    Likes Received:
    23,946
    Location:
    Farnham
    Style:
    Barnsley
    To clear up a couple of your comments

    The Foster incident was straight in front of us. Their player put his arms around fozzie and as fossie tried to pull away hung on to him causing them both to fall over. No question the correct decision was a penalty.

    The free kick was actually given by the Linesman - who was further away than I was (and the ref for that matter) and certainly the pushing started before the kick was taken but if giving a foul it had to be our way.

    Interestingly they started showing the replay at the ground and once they realised it was showing the "penalty" incident was given the wrong way cut the feed.

    What about the tackle on Hume 2nd half by the way when he was through on goal and got taken out from behind. From where we were it looked a pen - but it was a long way away so hard to be sure
     
  18. SuperTyke

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    55,830
    Likes Received:
    29,975
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I don't remember the Hume incident so can't comment on that sorry, but the Foster one was definetly not a penalty, the sky replay's showed that both players were equally to blame, as did the live feed that showed fosters arms around the defender and the defenders arms around foster before the freekick was taken.
     
  19. ark

    ark104 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2007
    Messages:
    1,196
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sorry but although it would have been a harsh penalty there player was the agressor and to blame nt
     
  20. Dar

    Darred Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    1,023
    Likes Received:
    7
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I've though for some time that what Barnsley needs is a few years of stability with the same manager and after initial reservations about sacking Richie thought Davey was the man, particularly in light of last seasons cup heroics.

    BUT Yesterday's performance was a shocker and Davey's team selection and tactics left much to be desired.

    1. The midfield he picked don't have a decent tackle between them. They were all over the place and even when we had the ball promptly gave it back to Palace. Anderson looked as if he didn't give a monkey's, Deveney and Leon are just not good enough, JCR the only one worth his place.

    2. The "Front 2" were really a front one with Hume doing all the work. Whats the point of having a strike pair that you punt the ball up to, (straight over your "ball playing midfield"), and the five foot one goes for the headers and the bigger man looks to run through? Hume was trying to win headers against 2 six footers FFS! Please send Rigters back, I'd rather see one of our academy lads given a go and I can't see where Macken or Odejayi would have been any worse.

    3. The organisation at set pieces, particularly when we had a corner was appalling, we were in more danger of giving a goal away when we had a corner than when they did!

    I reckon Davey's got one game to save his job.....COME ON YOU REDS!!
     

Share This Page