regarding this situation with Dawson - well you must be even dafter than I think you are. It's no secret I think he's a terrible player and my definition of working hard is not aimlessly running around like a lunatic. However, the last thing I want is for any of our players to be guilty of any form of corruption BUT if he is found guilty he should be terminated with immediate affect. Gally - you ****ed up singling me out in that thread by the way.
And if Mellis did the same you'd say we shouldn't terminate his contract, even though we're now playing a lot better now that he's not even on the bench And funnily enough we're winning with Dawson in midfield and being the captain. How strange is that?
Quite a leap to say that CT would say NOT to sack Mellis if he was the one involved when he has said he doesn't want ANY player to be found to have been involved. I think any player found guilty of being involved in this kind of thing, regardless of ability (or lack of) should be sacked. It would be pointless not doing so as they would be banned anyway...
Very strange. Oddly strange now you point Can't understand it myself.......... Nar - it's wrong to troll on this one.
oh? Care to explain why? And if you weren't rubbing your hands together in glee you did a cracking job of coming across that way!
From that post you put on earlier it came across like you want him to be quilty. Innocent until proven guilty etc etc
Five posts and you're trying to second guess my mindset. I'd be saying the same thing whether it's Dawson, Mellis or Neil Redfearn.
Why? Why do you feel the need to kiss site admin's arses? It was an observation so if you read that as some kind of threat it says far more about you than it does me.