Are we better without McPhail?

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by Guest, Sep 11, 2005.

  1. Gue

    Guest Guest

    I think on yesterday's performance the answer is a resounding yes! We didn't miss him one little bit, did we?
     
  2. Gue

    Guest Guest

    I think Burns is a more important player to us than mcphail and Kay is more than capable so we didnt miss him
     
  3. Gue

    Guest Guest

    exactly but

    i think he is our best player
     
  4. Gue

    Guest Guest

    RED/CJD

    Would you like to buy some L plates?

    They're not stolen but you can pretend if you like. £2?
     
  5. Gue

    Guest Guest

    nooooooooooooooooooooo
     
  6. Gue

    Guest Guest

    Is it because they're not stolen?

    Will it ruin your rep, big man?
     
  7. rot

    rothred Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    6,452
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Keith hills PR adviser
    Location:
    On the sofa
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I thought we'd miss him

    but on yesterdays display burns & kay looked pretty solid and they were winning the ball much higher on the field.
     
  8. Gue

    Guest Guest

    yer they were, but i like mcphail too much to have him on the bench
     
  9. Map

    Mapplewell Tyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    Messages:
    4,034
    Likes Received:
    142
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    RE: yer they were, but i like mcphail too much to have him on the bench

    (2gay)
     
  10. Gue

    Guest Guest

    RE: yer they were, but i like mcphail too much to have him on the bench

    But who do u drop for McPhail to play none of the players deserve to be dropped. I have to agree though he is our most talented player
     
  11. Gue

    Guest Guest

    5 in midfield?
     
  12. Gue

    Guest Guest

    RE: 5 in midfield?

    Stil who do you drop though
     
  13. Gue

    Guest Guest

    RE: exactly but

    No he's not! McPhail is probably our most technically accomplished player but he is lazy and doesn't contribute enough to be worthy of a place in the team. TEAM being the important word here.
     
  14. Gue

    Guest Guest

    kay if i had to play 4 in midfield
     
  15. Gue

    Guest Guest

    RE: 5 in midfield?

    What and be like England trying to make a place for someone who doesn't really fit in.If you do play 5 in midfield, you still have to leave someone out. Who would it be, a forward or a defender?
     
  16. Gue

    Guest Guest

    RE: kay if i had to play 4 in midfield

    He doesnt deserve to be dropped but can we not have mcphail in the team because on his day he is one of the best players in this division
     
  17. Gue

    Guest Guest

    it has to be 4-4-2

    kay dropped
     
  18. Gue

    Guest Guest

    RE: it has to be 4-4-2

    You have no more idea than Sven had in midweek. Thank god Ritchie seems to have developed some sense at last. McPhail is the only player at Barnsley who doesn't give at least 100% some of the time.
     
  19. Gue

    Guest Guest

    agreed he doesnt work but other wise brilliant
     
  20. Gue

    Guest Guest

    RE: it has to be 4-4-2

    Ere ere. When you have a so called "Star Player" who isn't giving 100% it soon rubs off on the other 10 mere mortals. On Saturday we had less technical ability on the field but the enthusiasm, pride and determination more than made up for it.
     

Share This Page