back from yeovil player ratings

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by Guest, Dec 17, 2005.

  1. Gue

    Guest Guest

    not at the races today lets just hope its a blip-bloody annoying though considering journey

    flinders 7- 2 excellent saves slightly at fault for 2nd
    austin 6- often out of position
    reid- 6- very poor game today
    kay 5- he cant find a player he can do 2 things 1.f*ck it up 2.hoof upfield
    hassel 7-another decent performance
    williams 4-and only that cos he scored-always out of position offered no support to austin
    howard 6-very quiet but midfield bypassed today by kays clearances
    burns 6 another solid performance
    shuker 7-couple of good things but very lacklustre
    richards 3- :-| :-| :-|
    hayes 4- im sorry but this guy is not good enough and im aparently a tit for saying so at game according to certain london tykes

    mcphail 5-game lost when came on=no effort
    wroe 5-**********
    carbon 5-same as kay hoof it as far away as poss at every opporunity
     
  2. Redstar

    Redstar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    26,953
    Likes Received:
    2,050
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Fidel's Bedside
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Glad you are back safe...

    Why play two players, Austin and Williams out of position? Why not play McPhail at back at Howard on wing?
     
  3. sam

    sambora Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,282
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    athersley
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    dont know-but they did look very vwry tired today-williams not interested - james was not happy
     
  4. Gue

    Guest Guest

    decent performance by Hassell warrants a 7, as does some good saves by Flinders. Then, Shuker warrants a 7 for being "lacklustre" my goodness!
     
  5. sam

    sambora Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,282
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    athersley
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    he was lacklustre but i give him 7 because he looked like he was trying-unlike half of team
     
  6. Gue

    Guest Guest

    So, basically, he ran around a lot?
     
  7. sam

    sambora Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,282
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    athersley
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    and took playerson chased most ofkays hoofs upfield
     
  8. Gue

    Guest Guest

    So, he gets a 7 for running around a lot. Same old same old then, excellent.
     
  9. sam

    sambora Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,282
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    athersley
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    ???? were you there-if so youl concur it was more han just running
     
  10. Redstar

    Redstar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    26,953
    Likes Received:
    2,050
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Fidel's Bedside
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    oh dear...I bet he was fuming then

    If they were tired he should have mixed it up a bit, but then again, they do say don't change a winning team
     
  11. Gaz

    Gaz Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    5,210
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    No idea. Definitely not at work, though. Honest.
    Home Page:
    Thank you.

    Someone else gets it.
     
  12. joc

    jock New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    4,583
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    York
    Home Page:
    hayes and richards not up to it? maybe you should try going to games rather than london ones. go to games and you will find out how wrong you are

    b4 you start, i've travelled further than most bfc fans today so ****** to ya
     
  13. Sla

    Slawit red Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2005
    Messages:
    831
    Likes Received:
    173
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Disagree
    Flinders did make some good saves but cost us with the second goal. This is the third time in four games a ball has bounced off his chest to opposing players who have then touched it in.

    How can you give Hayes a 4. He was the only player to create, I understand he only does this when the ball is at his feet but thats not his fault. In the secondhalf when he brought the ball down playing into space for himself in the same move was brilliant, As per at Bradford the ball needs to be played for him to run onto.
     
  14. Gue

    Guest Guest

    He wasn't the only "shocker" yesterday...

    but a quick synopsis was...

    decent crosses: 0
    crosses hitting 1st defender: the rest
    dribbled ball aimlessly out of play: 1
    ruined decent positions by going for shot and kicking ball over bar: 3

    He was dross. Bring back my Devaney...
     
  15. Cor

    Cornish Red New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    758
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    I felt sorry for Richards, thought he worked his socks off making the best of the ***** balls being pumped up from a hoof it defence. We seem to have no game plan when the opposition flood the midfield, hence the hit and hope approach. It was nice to see Flinders applaud the away support, the rest of them just trundled off.

    Great to hear the banter from the fans, I miss all that living darn sarf.
     
  16. Gue

    Guest Guest

    Shukes had sickness bug

    and threw up as he left the pitch at the end of the match. I thought we played crap but apparently, a few players were starting with the sickness bug in addition to being tired.
     
  17. Farnham_Red

    Farnham_Red Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    34,523
    Likes Received:
    23,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Farnham
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Must have had a different view of our strikers and left back

    I have a different opinion about some of those my ratings in red</p>

    <table class="bbstable" cellspacing="1" width="100%"><tbody><tr><td class="messagemiddle" valign="top">

    flinders 7- 2 excellent saves slightly at fault for 2nd
    <font color="#ff0000">I'd go for 6 2 Excellent saves cost us the second</font></p><font color="#ff0000"></font>


    austin 6- often out of position
    <font color="#ff0000">I'd give him 3 - hardly ever in position - to blame for first goal - where the **** was he?</font></p><font color="#ff0000"></font>


    reid- 6- very poor game today
    <font color="#ff0000">Agreed! 6</font></p>

     
    kay 5- he cant find a player he can do 2 things 1.f*ck it up 2.hoof upfield
    <font color="#ff0000">Agreed on comment but 4</font></p><font color="#ff0000"></font>


    hassel 7-another decent performance
    <font color="#ff0000">Agreed 7</font> </p>


    williams 4-and only that cos he scored-always out of position offered no support to austin
    <font color="#ff0000">Agreed 4</font> </p>


    howard 6-very quiet but midfield bypassed today by kays clearances
    <font color="#ff0000">Agreed 6</font></p><font color="#ff0000"></font>


    burns 6 another solid performance
    <font color="#ff0000">Agreed 6</font></p>

     
    shuker 7-couple of good things but very lacklustre
    <font color="#ff0000">Agreed but 6</font></p>

     
    richards 3- [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
    <font color="#ff0000">Oh come ou - you cant seriously recon he was worse than Austin and Williams I'd give him a 5</font></p>

      
    hayes 4- im sorry but this guy is not good enough and im aparently a tit for saying so at game according to certain london tykes
    <font color="#ff0000">Agree with the London Tykes - he was our only player with any creativity and he is good enough - 6
    </font>

    mcphail 5-game lost when came on=no effort
    <font color="#ff0000">Agreed 5</font>
    wroe 5-**********
    <font color="#ff0000">What? 3</font> 
    carbon 5-same as kay hoof it as far away as poss at every opporunity
    <font color="#ff0000">Defence looked better when he was there 6</font></p></td></tr><tr><td class="messagefooter" style="HEIGHT: 20px"></td></tr></tbody></table></p>
     
  18. Caz

    Cazi New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    Messages:
    13,133
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    A completely different planet to everybody else
    Home Page:
    Didn't see Flinders applaud us as the frostbite was beginning to set in on my feet so I made a transvestite type walk back to the car.
     
  19. Gue

    Guest Guest

    RE: Must have had a different view of our strikers and left back

    i see TMFDM is back again as shuker has had a bad game and we been beat as he could not have a go during a none-losing period can but as soon as we get beat shukers biggest hater was there to jump on his back AS USUAL, not that all the other 10 players had outstanding games and is shukers fault that we lost wasn't it

    TMFDM get off his back and at least have a go at other players when they have bad games cos your constant barracking of shuker is getting extremely (zzz) see above as to why you have left him alone the previous 11 games

    rant over
     
  20. Ali

    Alityke Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    5,672
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Shed head
    Home Page:
    Didn't like to mention it cazi love

    LOL at tranny walk
     

Share This Page