not at the races today lets just hope its a blip-bloody annoying though considering journey flinders 7- 2 excellent saves slightly at fault for 2nd austin 6- often out of position reid- 6- very poor game today kay 5- he cant find a player he can do 2 things 1.f*ck it up 2.hoof upfield hassel 7-another decent performance williams 4-and only that cos he scored-always out of position offered no support to austin howard 6-very quiet but midfield bypassed today by kays clearances burns 6 another solid performance shuker 7-couple of good things but very lacklustre richards 3- :-| :-| :-| hayes 4- im sorry but this guy is not good enough and im aparently a tit for saying so at game according to certain london tykes mcphail 5-game lost when came on=no effort wroe 5-********** carbon 5-same as kay hoof it as far away as poss at every opporunity
Glad you are back safe... Why play two players, Austin and Williams out of position? Why not play McPhail at back at Howard on wing?
decent performance by Hassell warrants a 7, as does some good saves by Flinders. Then, Shuker warrants a 7 for being "lacklustre" my goodness!
oh dear...I bet he was fuming then If they were tired he should have mixed it up a bit, but then again, they do say don't change a winning team
hayes and richards not up to it? maybe you should try going to games rather than london ones. go to games and you will find out how wrong you are b4 you start, i've travelled further than most bfc fans today so ****** to ya
Disagree Flinders did make some good saves but cost us with the second goal. This is the third time in four games a ball has bounced off his chest to opposing players who have then touched it in. How can you give Hayes a 4. He was the only player to create, I understand he only does this when the ball is at his feet but thats not his fault. In the secondhalf when he brought the ball down playing into space for himself in the same move was brilliant, As per at Bradford the ball needs to be played for him to run onto.
He wasn't the only "shocker" yesterday... but a quick synopsis was... decent crosses: 0 crosses hitting 1st defender: the rest dribbled ball aimlessly out of play: 1 ruined decent positions by going for shot and kicking ball over bar: 3 He was dross. Bring back my Devaney...
I felt sorry for Richards, thought he worked his socks off making the best of the ***** balls being pumped up from a hoof it defence. We seem to have no game plan when the opposition flood the midfield, hence the hit and hope approach. It was nice to see Flinders applaud the away support, the rest of them just trundled off. Great to hear the banter from the fans, I miss all that living darn sarf.
Shukes had sickness bug and threw up as he left the pitch at the end of the match. I thought we played crap but apparently, a few players were starting with the sickness bug in addition to being tired.
Must have had a different view of our strikers and left back I have a different opinion about some of those my ratings in red</p> <table class="bbstable" cellspacing="1" width="100%"><tbody><tr><td class="messagemiddle" valign="top"> flinders 7- 2 excellent saves slightly at fault for 2nd <font color="#ff0000">I'd go for 6 2 Excellent saves cost us the second</font></p><font color="#ff0000"></font> austin 6- often out of position <font color="#ff0000">I'd give him 3 - hardly ever in position - to blame for first goal - where the **** was he?</font></p><font color="#ff0000"></font> reid- 6- very poor game today <font color="#ff0000">Agreed! 6</font></p> kay 5- he cant find a player he can do 2 things 1.f*ck it up 2.hoof upfield <font color="#ff0000">Agreed on comment but 4</font></p><font color="#ff0000"></font> hassel 7-another decent performance <font color="#ff0000">Agreed 7</font> </p> williams 4-and only that cos he scored-always out of position offered no support to austin <font color="#ff0000">Agreed 4</font> </p> howard 6-very quiet but midfield bypassed today by kays clearances <font color="#ff0000">Agreed 6</font></p><font color="#ff0000"></font> burns 6 another solid performance <font color="#ff0000">Agreed 6</font></p> shuker 7-couple of good things but very lacklustre <font color="#ff0000">Agreed but 6</font></p> richards 3- <font color="#ff0000">Oh come ou - you cant seriously recon he was worse than Austin and Williams I'd give him a 5</font></p> hayes 4- im sorry but this guy is not good enough and im aparently a tit for saying so at game according to certain london tykes <font color="#ff0000">Agree with the London Tykes - he was our only player with any creativity and he is good enough - 6 </font> mcphail 5-game lost when came on=no effort <font color="#ff0000">Agreed 5</font> wroe 5-********** <font color="#ff0000">What? 3</font> carbon 5-same as kay hoof it as far away as poss at every opporunity <font color="#ff0000">Defence looked better when he was there 6</font></p></td></tr><tr><td class="messagefooter" style="HEIGHT: 20px"></td></tr></tbody></table></p>
Didn't see Flinders applaud us as the frostbite was beginning to set in on my feet so I made a transvestite type walk back to the car.
RE: Must have had a different view of our strikers and left back i see TMFDM is back again as shuker has had a bad game and we been beat as he could not have a go during a none-losing period can but as soon as we get beat shukers biggest hater was there to jump on his back AS USUAL, not that all the other 10 players had outstanding games and is shukers fault that we lost wasn't it TMFDM get off his back and at least have a go at other players when they have bad games cos your constant barracking of shuker is getting extremely (zzz) see above as to why you have left him alone the previous 11 games rant over