Barry Conlon and another possible legal battle???

Don't know if this has been posted but basically.....</p>

Barry is injured. Rotherham agreed to take Barry on loan, and PAY him, until 31 January 2006. However, now Barry is injured they wish to send him back to Barnsley. Barnsley have said &quot;Get ballaxed, he is your player until 31 January, you keep him...&quot;. Rotherham have said &quot;No&quot; and its all a bit of mess.</p>

Currently, Barry isn't get paid by either club and neither club is willing to pay for treatment for him.</p>

Does this confirm just how poor Barnsley FC is? Where does he stand? Where do the clubs stand?</p>

Another court battle looms....</p>

 

no i confirms that

the only way we could get players in was to send them out, pay for BBB = no more Watt or the likes of him coming in.

 

RE: no i confirms that

the club who has him on loan should pay his wages...

 

BFC say that he was fit

http://www.barnsleyfc.org.uk/bbs/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=12404&mid=73591#M73591

 

It IS in the contract...

that Rotherham keep him until 31 January 2006.</p>

Poor Barry. Injured and not getting paid. You have to feel for him, don't you? Don't you???</p>

 

Cheers Crystal...

clears it up for me anyway.</p>

How could he have been injured when they were playing him???</p>

 

This confirms what a shitty business football is, which treats players like a piece of meat and throws them out when they are of no further use.

 

Agreed.

I feel sorry for him.</p>

Good luck in sorting it Barry!</p>

 

looking at it from another point of view

where is the loyalty from the players? Paul hayes quit scnuthorpe and went to a tribunal to try and ensure that the club that had trained him for three years didnt get much money.

 

Michael Hughes

Got into the same ruck between Birmingham City and Crystal Palace

 

Expensive meat - I've no no reason to feel sorry as most are overpaid.