Berkcroft = Conmen

Always loyal to their mates though, especially mates with the same agent as they have. They always look after their mates and make sure they get good contracts, and when they undeservedly hit the jackpot they certainly like to spread the wealth.

 

Im more amused over the fact they all seem to have the same agent...

 

Lloydy strikes again.

 

Its not what you know, it's who you know.

 

Needs investigating.

 

As does the decision to sanction the transfers.

 

Or refusing to pay agents fat fees (as most fans want) means using agents who don't charge fat fees?

 

Who or what is Berkcroft

 

I imagine Hill is Berk and Flitcroft is Croft.

 

This thread must be potentially libelous.

 

How so....

 

It's common knowledge that both managers were represented by the head of an agency whose firm represented a long old list of our former players. Same players who've since rejoined those managers. They also had other lads on their books who Keith/Flicker tried recruiting.

Is it wrong, unethical? I dunno. Maybe it's a safe way of recruiting? I dunno.

 

I wouldn't have thought calling two football managers "conmen" is a particularly clever idea.