In the Cryne interview in the Evening Post he says:- "I think it is possible to identify a couple of things that turned our season and I feel that was finally moving Brian Howard on as after that we started to get the results." Thats as clear as crystal for me that Howard was a disruption to the dressing room and we are better off without him.
He's also a goalscoring midfielder very useful when you have useless gets like Rigters and Odejayi up front
RE: Brian Howard was possibly a disruptive influence It reads to me as well that he wasn't too good for dressing room harmony. Look at our results since he left - much improved, or did his leaving coincide with Anderson's return which would have improved results?
Snap wor that his big 'ead got lodged in t' doorway and then no bugger could get round him!</p> Blunts haven't sussed him and sent him back have they?? </p>
Cryne has already gone on record as saying Davey was "gutted" when Brian Howard went. It's probably fairer to say that the "disruption" was more to do with the fact that saga went on for so long....
Thats scored how many since he left us after WANTING to leave us?? As far as i am concerned, and i know a few others agree, he was the reason for the bad start
I wonder if Maverick 10 now posts on the Blunts board on our Bri's "behalf" strange that he's not posted on here since october innit?
Would that be Brians cousin who was voicing opionions that were Brians even though according to him old brian was gagged by the club?