http://www.sportinglife.com/footbal...porarily-removing-player-who-injures-opponent First time Messi fouls a player he goes off the park and the fouled player 'receives treatment' for the rest of the match. Genius, Messi is no longer a threat.
"The current system isn't fair. The player who commits the foul is only cautioned and stays on the pitch while the team with the injured player is left a man down. "It effectively gives an advantage to the other team." You've only just worked that out? You stupid, stupid, stupid ******* arseholes. Why on earth then are you making players leave the field who have been fouled and had a bit of treatment on the field? You ******* morons.
we can learn a lot from Rugby in my opinion Jay the sin bin is one thing.... that's the yellow card served right there right then... but make it 15 minutes and not 10. Injury..... also in cricket I believe. Let the subs be used for tactics as they should be... of course the Injured playe should ony be like for like .... goalie/goalie defender/defender etc. What I am getting at is suppose a team has made all 3 subs then the goalie gets injured(for instance) then it should be allowed for that injury to be replaced..... and if the goalie is able to return then all well and good.... It would stop all the lengthy on pitch treatments too.
