Can I have a moan about the new improved hand baggage allowance

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by Farnham_Red, Aug 14, 2006.

  1. Farnham_Red

    Farnham_Red Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    34,222
    Likes Received:
    23,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Farnham
    Style:
    Barnsley
    I know it wont do any good but it will make me feel better.

    So we have got rid of the completely unworkable no hand baggage at all restriction that would have actually made it impossible for me to work economically - whopeee.

    And now have (and I suspect for a long time) a new relaxed system that just and only just gives the minimum I need but at maximum inconvenience and for minimum benefit.

    So now I can take my laptop and phone on a plane secure in the knowledge that I will still have them and they will work, however as the new improved allowance is 60% less than the old one there is no way I can travel without checking hold baggage anymore (unless for a day trip). This adds significantly to my journey time if leaving Heathrow and f**k knows how long on the way back - waits of 1 hour + are common - assuming your bag actually makes it at all.

    If we are to introduce such a draconian policy that forces all passengers to check luggage didnt we first ought to introduce a quick and reliable baggage check in and handling service.

    Now to the real gripe though - how does this new policy make us safer? Surely a suicide bomber can put a bomb in the hold and detonate it with a phone or use a timer or use a pressure sensitive detonator. He can safely sail through security and his bag wont be offloaded. How does allowing enough space for a few clothes compromise safety significantly

    The answers are of course this is all about appearences - I cant see how the new measures are any safer than the old ones - but because they are more restrictive they give the impression of being so to those who dont think this through properly. The government can be seen to be doing something and they can get on with controlling a bit more of the lives of the regular law abiding citizen.

    By the way the first successful use of a liquid bomb on a plane was 12 years ago so this is hardly new. (furious)
     
  2. Mid

    Mido Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2006
    Messages:
    11,873
    Likes Received:
    7,169
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    better than gettin blown up m8
     
  3. Geriatrictyke

    Geriatrictyke New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2005
    Messages:
    2,147
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Barnsley, , United Kingdom
    Home Page:
    Moan by all means , but dont expect sympathy. Oh no.
     
  4. Gue

    Guest Guest

    it sounds like a moan but it what you wrote does sound logical

    i can see why ya narked
     
  5. Farnham_Red

    Farnham_Red Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    34,222
    Likes Received:
    23,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Farnham
    Style:
    Barnsley
    My point though is it doesnt make it safer

    how does saying you can take electronic equipment such aslaptop mobile phone ipod and camer onto a planebag on just big enough for a laptop but no clothes make you safer than taking the above and a couple of shirts and changes of underwear and a book?
     
  6. EastStander

    EastStander Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    29,883
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Upper tier, Gangway 11
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    reducing carry on baggage is long overdue regardless of the reasons....some people really do take the piss with what they take on as carry on - it should just be things essential for the flight.
     
  7. EastStander

    EastStander Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    29,883
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Upper tier, Gangway 11
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Have you downed a bottle of vodka in the last few minutes?!
     
  8. arc

    arcticmonkeyred New Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,176
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    pub
    Home Page:
    i can still take my ipod on again now (Y)
     
  9. Geriatrictyke

    Geriatrictyke New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2005
    Messages:
    2,147
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Barnsley, , United Kingdom
    Home Page:
    ALL carry on will be searched, greater %age hand searched

    So the more you have in your carry on the longer the search time. I am serious when I tell you that should we go to critical again very soon, then the body searches in all probability will include body cavities, then see how long we all are
     
  10. EastStander

    EastStander Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    29,883
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Upper tier, Gangway 11
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    When I say "essential for the flight" I mean things you need/require to elleviate boredom on the flight - such as a MP3 player, book, newspaper etc.
     
  11. Farnham_Red

    Farnham_Red Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    34,222
    Likes Received:
    23,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Farnham
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Why?

    why is it a problem to take a bag with some clothes and a laptop onto a plane.

    Yes some people did take the piss - but that can be stopped easily by strict enforcement of the old rules.

    For people who go on holiday once a year an extra hour at each end whilst checking in and waiting for luggage is no big deal - especially as usually more stuff is taken than is practical to put on a plane anyway. but for people who travel as part of their work (I did over 50 flights last year and am heading for a similar number this year) it shortens our working week and eats into our weekend. Not funny if its every second week on average .
     
  12. Farnham_Red

    Farnham_Red Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    34,222
    Likes Received:
    23,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Farnham
    Style:
    Barnsley
    2 points

    If longer search time -employ more security staff then not rocket science. No problem with that (in any case the airports cant cope with the extra baggage so they need to employ more checkin staff and baggage handlers so either way its going to cost more

    If body cavity searches become commonplace then the terrorists have won - this would have a decimating effect on British Industry - way beyond the airline industry
     
  13. Farnham_Red

    Farnham_Red Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    34,222
    Likes Received:
    23,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Farnham
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Eh - thats a Windyesque response

    Not yet no
     
  14. Geriatrictyke

    Geriatrictyke New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2005
    Messages:
    2,147
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Barnsley, , United Kingdom
    Home Page:
    RE: Why?

    No not funny for the regular commuter, but the security conditions are set to protect all travellers, cant make a set just for those who would wish to "take the risk".. Do you visit different destinations, or too and fro from just two ?
     
  15. Geriatrictyke

    Geriatrictyke New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2005
    Messages:
    2,147
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Barnsley, , United Kingdom
    Home Page:
    RE: 2 points

    more staff need a larger area in which to work. You know how cramped the security areas are at present. Yes you are bang right, more regular cavity searches and the terrorist will have won
     
  16. Farnham_Red

    Farnham_Red Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    34,222
    Likes Received:
    23,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Farnham
    Style:
    Barnsley
    RE: Why?

    Mostly between 3 or 4 destinations - not really practical to leave a set of clothes in each unfortunately especially as I dont allways stay in the same hotels either.

    My point still is its not really any safer though - phones and laptops are the most likely equipment to be used to conceal/set off bombs so once you allow them - you might as well allow a few clothes as well.

    If you don't allow them business travellers cant do their jobs. All I want is a properly policed sensible baggage policy - not sensationalism for effect but no real benefit
     
  17. Farnham_Red

    Farnham_Red Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    34,222
    Likes Received:
    23,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Farnham
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Yes but have you seen the checkin tents

    There isnt enough space if everyone checks baggage either. I still recon its easier to double the size of the security area than the baggage hall.

    or we can just fly with 30% less flights and put prices up I suppose
     
  18. Gue

    Guest Guest

    I can't believe people moan about this.

    Do you want to get blown up?

    Bombs cannot be put in hold luggage... do you think they are that stupid? Bombs have to be detonated and assembled bombs are flagged up by the systems. This plot was to assemble the bombs ON the plane.

    So your main 'gripe' is invalid - it clearly does make us safer.
     
  19. swindontyke

    swindontyke Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    443
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    A, A
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I think hold-baggage gets more stringent checks ....

    ... saw a report on the local BBC news down here the other night regarding the extra security checks that hold baggage gets over and above that is applied to cabin baggage.  </p>

    Apparently the X-Ray machines are more powerful and sniffer dogs are routinely used to check for explosives etc.  The scanners for cabin baggage only scan for recognisable shapes (guns, knives etc) and rely more on the physical checks by the staff.</p>
     
  20. Gue

    Guest Guest

    all hand baggage goes through the x-ray scanners

    the people there can tell what should be in a mobile and what shunt. i don't see how reducing the amount of hand luggage will prevent that? only banning all hand luggage would

    mr terrorist 1: hi we have a bomb we need to assemble concealed in mobile phones and laptops but due to the baggage restrictions i need to either take the Ko'ran and my mp3 player or my part of the bomb. i'm stuck

    mr terrorist 2: shut up ya daft lovely person. take the bomb obviously - that's well within the baggage limits
     

Share This Page