Why Remy Vita was deemed not good enough to be picked or even used as a sub in the first half of the season? Got me scratching my bonce on that one.
Not our player couldn't make money of him so why play him in front of those they could make money on. That can be the only reason
We've got an option to buy so how do you work that one out? Or why buy him at all? Far more likely that he came to the club really, really raw and lightweight and they've spent the first part of his loan getting him ready. We'll never ever know, but no guarantees he plays like has done if you throw him in at the start of the season.
It is a mystery as to why he was not at least given cameo roles off the bench before xmas , the lad was obviously doing enough in training to earn a place on the bench but never got any game time at all & what is completely baffling is that left back/wing back has been an ongoing problem for a long time & the lad is a natural with a big heart to supplement his obvious quality .
lol mate. Passed a couple of lads wi' shorts on walking down this aft. Proper hard nuts they must be. Or we're getting soft.....
They must be nuts. Just for going to the game that is. Watching it in shorts though.... they need help.
Quality loans should always be part of the plan and can also help us to go with a smaller better quality squad of contracted players. Hopefully the board are realising this too.
Definitely agree. Especially when you're taking some of the younger players from bigger clubs who have the right attitude and just want their first chance to play first team football.