RE: thats it? That's why we couldn't see what we was buying before we bought it. Because if we could then they would have struggled to sell even more then now. Could have been at least the real autographs and lamanated.
RE: What's wrong with it? The font is too fancy and swirly for a serious certificate. Fine on a poster or kids thing but not a certificate that people intend to hang on their wall. </p> Too bright for a serious certificate too.</p> Signatures are simply printed on. </p> In short, it looks tacky.</p>
Cheers Got one on my office wall now </p> I have to say that Kay's autograph looks like a bald man about to stick a pointy nose in a hole, Richard's looks like a catapult, and Tonge's looks like a snail.</p>
sorry that's just your opinion-there are no hard and fast rules about fonts-personally I think it's fine
RE: thats it? well yes but I'd have expected to pay significantly more-as it is they've sold all 500 as far as I know</p> and I've got 1 of them !!</p>
it's how it was marketted isnt it? A limited edition commemorative certificate to mark our promotion.
Sorry if I like to see a little bit of quality. If they were selling a limited edition model of oakwell would you be happy when it turned out to be a carboard box with Barnsley FC scribbled on the side in crayon?
RE: What's wrong with it? Tha's allus got summat to moan abart! If you don't want one, don't buy one. Simple