'All forms of racism, whether overt, implied, intentional or otherwise are completely forbidden and will result in bans for offenders. Persistant offenders will have their IP address banned permanently.' Does this threat include comments (not abuse) on other religions, as opposed to race? In other words, is it a total ban on the freedom to express one's opinion on such matters?
</p> Whilst it's currently not against the rulesto attempt to expose Islam as aviolent, hegemonisticmedieval cult it is likely that anyone doing so will be accused of racism by the hard of thinking.This is probably because it'sonly muslims to whom the racism rules apply.</p> So, while criticisng Islam is tolerated by site admin, criticising a Pakistani is not. You are, however, allowed to call Cat Stevens a ******. The rubbishing of any religion followed by the evil west is positively encouraged as isracism towards Frogs, Krauts, Jocks , Micks etc. The jury is out on the Yids as they're currently at loggerheads with the muslims and are therfore probably racists themselves. </p> It starts to get a little complicated with disaster jokes. Tsunami gags about Indonesians on deckchairs are met with rounds of chortling but, to date, no-one has been racist enoughto attempt a Pakistani earthquake joke.</p> Expressing your concerns for the plight ofthe femalehalf of the muslim population is still racism as is supporting action against a despot responsible for 1,000,000 muslim deaths.</p> </p> </p> </p> </p> .</p> </p> </p> .</p>
That's okay then. If there's one thing that really rubs me up the wrong way it's this evil, decadent, immoral Western society in which we live and I appreciate being allowed to say so.
RE:More clarification required interesting read.</p> questions(not a wind up)</p> 'This is probably because it'sonly muslims to whom the racism rules apply.' -I'm sure if someone was to call a black man the n word then the rules would apply.</p> 'So, while criticisng Islam is tolerated by site admin, criticising a Pakistani is not.'- what do you mean by criticising ?</p> 'Expressing your concerns for the plight ofthe femalehalf of the muslim population is still racism as is supporting action against a despot responsible for 1,000,000 muslim deaths.'-- Couldn't agree more with you about the plight of female muslims and i assume you mean action against Sadam but I can't see either being viewed as racist.</p> As i said above i am geniuinelyinterested .</p> Dave</p> </p>
Oh...er.... </p> Well it was a slightly tongue in cheek rant, mate, but here goes.</p> <font color="#000099">'This is probably because it'sonly muslims to whom the racism rules apply.' -I'm sure if someone was to call a black man the n word then the rules would apply.</font></p> <font color="#000099"><font color="#000000">You're absolutely right. although "oakwell" did get away with "chocolate face."</font> </font></p> <font color="#3300cc">'So, while criticisng Islam is tolerated by site admin, criticising a Pakistani is not.'- what do you mean by criticising ?</font></p> Well, you can say, "Islam is an intolerant, cruel fascist, organisation" but you can't say, "That Pakistani who runs our corner shop is a right dirty b4stard."</p> <font color="#0000cc">'Expressing your concerns for the plight ofthe femalehalf of the muslim population is still racism as is supporting action against a despot responsible for 1,000,000 muslim deaths.'-- Couldn't agree more with you about the plight of female muslims and i assume you mean action against Sadam but I can't see either being viewed as racist.</font></p> You're actually criticising muslim men there, the women don't matter. And of course muslim deaths caused by muslims aren't important but those brought about by the evil West are. Any support of action against muslims is racist. Actually I veered a bit from site admins view and into Bright Red and Acky territory there.</p> If you don't agree with all the above you're a racist anda bigot and you're not a decent human being. Ask anybody.</p>