Colin Healy...why?

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by Guest, Oct 21, 2006.

  1. Gue

    Guest Guest

    And to replace a creative midfielder like Howard, never in a million years, and no interest in tackling or fighting for the ball...absolutely useless, was amazed when Sunderland fans clapped him...do they want him back?
     
  2. Redstar

    Redstar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    26,953
    Likes Received:
    2,050
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Fidel's Bedside
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Trying to keep a point...

    doing what the book says but in the process abandoning attack principles.

    Healy is **** imho
     
  3. Gue

    Guest Guest

    Worse than w*nk imho

    And lost both games after he came on, not solely his fault but his appearance certainly didn't do the job it was intended to do.
     
  4. SuperTyke

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    55,747
    Likes Received:
    29,889
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    in my opinion

    Signing healy was a poor attempt to replace richard kell</p>

    Speaking of which, is kell still costing us money?</p>
     
  5. Redstar

    Redstar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    26,953
    Likes Received:
    2,050
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Fidel's Bedside
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    RE: in my opinion

    that's an interesting question. Good luck in getting an answer
     

Share This Page