Commentators really don't like Wright, do they?

Not seen anything much to prove them wrong in the few games I've seen him play but even so it makes me cringe when it's the official commentary.

 

hOPE HE MAKES THEM EAT THEIR WORDS

 

Was listening to the game on internet as Leicester played at dinner and we got beat 2-0. Bit fed up but can honestly say i think your commentators are terribl singling players out and ridiculing them. I think that is not a very good example to fans.
Where was it broadcast from and who are the broadcasters?
At least Barnsley played well. Leicester were not good at all.

 

RE: Well they werent raving about Devaney either

Thought he played well - took players on, one nutmeg that was class.

 

Ironically he looked far better than the normal two when he came on

 

No he didn't.

He was good. But so were Hayes and Richards. The commentators on Radio Sheffield said that Richards did as much as he could when he hit the bar because the keeper was right infront of him - I was critical of him for 30 minutes but he did well after that.

As for Hayes, with a decent striker alongside him, he'd have had at least 2 assists today if not 3. He's not an out n' out goalscorer but his vision, creativity and ability (pass to devaney in the first half just cut out by keeper, cross for richards, workrate to keep the ball in and cross for Devaney in 2nd half) '

We need a goalscorer, but to criticise anyone in a Red shirt after that performance is bizarre. Every one of them did the club, the fans and themselves proud.

 

RE: No he didn't.

</p>

</p>

I'll leave it at that</p>

 

Then maybe you should read it again..

To criticise anyone AFTER that performance...

I criticised him for 30 minutes during, and only mild criticism, but once he got stuck in, he was very good.

Idiot.