I was told today that he signed a pre-contract deal with us last January. Is this true? I thought Hill signed him not Robins?
So Robins did sign him? I had better say sorry to my mate tomorrow then. I told him that it was impossible because Robins couldnt sign a striker while he had a hole in his arse!!
From what I was told he got offered several deals in January but waited until the season ended to make a decision.
Pre-contract was signed in June by Hill. As did Perkins. http://www.barnsleynews.co.uk/sports-news/barnsley-to-sign-chesterfield-striker-craig-davies-1778
I thought you couldn't approach players now (legally) until they only have a month left on their contract?
Even if Robins had signed him and he'd played under him he wouldn't be scoring like he is now due to tactics / formations, etc. This is just my opinion of course.
That's unfair on a man who used his excellent pedigree as a striker in his playing days, to bring in class like a cokehead when manager with us
you maybe right, but then again we will never know! At the beginning of last season Robins changed the way we were playing and we looked Ok at times, maybe if we had Davies then instead of clown feet!! who knows what would have happened.
I didnt dislike harewood mark. i think you should read my posts propley before saying things like that later.
'propley' brilliant! Yes Hemsiel, you are absolutely correct! What it means is if Craig Davies has sex in the botty like, with anybody else apart from Keith Hill and maybe Flicker on drunk saturday nights but only if he's scored with the ball in the net like,--- so if that happens, yeah then any club who would like to give him one too, a contract- will have to give some pogs and three cigs MINIMUM and then will have to agree terms with the player in terms of weights of crack and illegal fire arms, alledgedly. I can't swear this is true but it's what I heard from the Mams of the under-12s at training t'other night.