Crouch - Why?

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by Zukkster, Jun 20, 2006.

  1. Zuk

    Zukkster New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,528
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    #1 Zukkster, Jun 20, 2006
    If he gets a yellow, then we really are f@cked in the next game. If ever there was a time to risk Theo now is the one. Fairly meaningless.

    What's the point?

    My money is on Crouch suspended next game and us having to blood Theo.

    Sven goes from hyper-cautious to reckless
     
  2. Ady

    Ady Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2005
    Messages:
    6,837
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Home
    Home Page:
    #2 Ady, Jun 20, 2006
    agree with you there, assured of the next stage, so why not put Theo on. [​IMG]
     
  3. Gud

    GudjonFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    4,615
    Likes Received:
    405
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    The Sanctuary of the 18 Yard Line
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    #3 GudjonFan, Jun 20, 2006
    I know what you mean. I bet that is the reason Sven gave to Crouch when he "rested" him.

    To be fair to Sven, I think is trying to win the game. Arguably, it gives us a better chance of progressing - because we will be playing the weakest team in the other group.
     
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)

Share This Page