Curbishley's appointment didnt take long.

Why cant we do it that fast?

 

if curbs was interested, then it would have probably...

this next appointment is the biggest decision they are likely to make for the forseeable future.

AND

this one has to be spot on, if that takes a month to do, so be it.

id rather that, than "panic buy" so to speak an install a manager without thinking


Can't see the problem misen

 

Imagine the backlash if we had

damned if you do, damned if you dont.

 

Ironic if he saves West Ham and Charlton go down

which is very possible.

 

Why sack someone if there is no one any better available?

I would have liked the board to have some idea who they might like before a manager is sacked.

 

Why would that be ironic?

 

RE: Why sack someone if there is no one any better available?

but we've got better, signings and results prove that.

what the board are waiting for is someone even better than the better one we have.
remember, the problem was the loan window closing ont eh friday and complete inactivity from AR, tehy had to act then, or by the end of jan we'd be buggered.

 

dont you mean the other way around, if West Ham go down, and Charlton stay up.

 

Have you been on the home brew?

parp.

 

Someone post a definition of irony ffs,

I really dont know why I come on here. no really. witgettingalifeforxmasart.

 

Like when Hart jumped into Gudjons shoes?

all the best laid plans....

 

Good article here

http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,3605,985375,00.html

 

If Charlton had sacked him because they were likely to get relegated

Then I might agree with you.

 

Good?

in what sense?

 

Interesting

 

Interesting to whom

I'll race you to a million pointless posts.

 

RE: Interesting to whom

You are closer than I am to a million pointless posts!

 

RE: Interesting to whom

If you're looking for irony take a look at Windy and Owen/Bingley further up.