<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">If I were Andy Ritchie, I would give Danny Nardiello the first 50 minutes of the game.</font></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">I know he is a bit lazy but he is a finisher at the end of the day. Then for the last 40 minutes I would</font></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">Bring on one of the quicker forwards on when the defenders are getting tired .</font></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"></font></p>
RE: Dani Nardiello i agree, i mean most people in the ponty yestarday were callin for him on and then they near enough shouted at him. he is lazy at times but when he is up to scoring, he'll do just that.(2gay) (2gay) (2gay) (2gay) (2gay) (2gay) (2gay) (2gay) (2gay) (2gay)
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">I think it could be beneficial for Paul Hayes to play the last 40 minutes of the game until he gets his confidence back. Then play Marc Richards or Nathan Jarman, which I think is faster in the sprint, then Nardiello. </font></p>
RE: Dani Nardiello But he's not going to score by standing in an offside position or watching the ball cause it didn't go exactly to where he wanted it. I tend to feel he's a good weapon as a sub cause he does have some pace (when he decides to use it). I'd be tempted to start with Richards and Jarman next week.
RE: Dani Nardiello I'd be tempted to bring Jarman on before Nardiello. At least Jarman gives his all and doesnt stop running at the defenders
Until Mr Nardiello learns the offside law, stops sulking because he isn't in the first team and starts making an effort then bringing him on off the bench is a waste of time. The solution is definitely not to start him either. I fail to see why he is so popular, other than the initial loan period two years ago nearly we haven't seen anything special from him at all. And as for Jarman being another Griff Jones type player, whom we've had 'millions', maybe we have produced many forwards who haven't stepped up to the first team. In the past they werent' given a go - and Jarman is being tried. And doing OK if unspectacular. Leave off - Flinders, Austin, Kay, Williams, Tonge, Wroe, Jarman - regularly in the first team squad of 16 when available, just short of half. If ever there was an argument to keep the academy....
yeah look at the players we let go who we thought couldnt score. glyn hurst, rory fallon, luke beckett etc. so i reckon jarman will start scoring with a proper chance.
