Davey v Ritchie

Can someone post the stats comparison between S.D and A.R which was on this board a few days ago.

 

Davey has had 17 games and has collected 23pts (ave 1.35) and has 7 clean sheets.
Ritchie had 18 games and collected 15 pts (ave 0.83) and had 1 clean sheet.

 

That's interesting! Suprised me a little that.

 

SD is obviously doing something right. nt

 

Wasn't that posted before the Stoke game?</p>

If so, Davey has now had the same number of games (18) and has 26 points at 1.44pg with 8 clean sheets.</p>

 

Ritchies stats gives us 38 pts over the season and that is definite bottom of the table, laughing stock material. Daveys stats gives us 62pts. Whats it to be, Ritchies mythical exciting football or the reality of Davey? No brainer me thinks.

 

No mate. Just worked them out again with Stoke included.

 

I pay £22 to be entertained.

I am not being entertained, therefore it is evident that I should go elsewhere. I am pleased that the majority on this board are over the moon because we are accumulating points at the expense of entertainment. If that makes BFC and fans happy, so be it.

 

Maybe you should go to the theatre.

 

RE: I pay £22 to be entertained.

Don't be so chuffin stupid. That's how a neutral observer would look at it. A supporter, given the choice of pretty football with no end result or a scruffy, backs-to-the-wall-3-points, would always choose the latter.

 

Ill gladly put winning ugly and staying up before entertainment.

Surely you must have gleaned some pleasure from the three goal win against hull and the way we battled at Stoke.

 

Theres just no pleasing some people.

 

**** off xerxes you numpty. for **** sake do us a favour and stay away you boring negetive Tw*t