Davey's position not even discussed. 11 goals for Stan!

But still favourite to be next sacking.</p>

http://www.thestar.co.uk/reds/Davey39s-position-39not-even-discussed39.4504167.jp</p>

 

isn't the board..............

..just P Cryne B Taylor and D Rowing?

 

Thought it was just Taylor and Rowing.

And I don't think either of those would have much say!

 

RE: isn't the board..............

Cryne is not a director

 

Ferenczi is playing in the equivalent of League 2. nt

 

Do we really believe that?

P6 W1 L5 and the board aren't discussing what's wrong?

 

Should they use the same criteria for sacking him as Ritchie?

i.e. PPG? or is SD a special case and needs to be given more time?

 

Just rewind 12 months

have a quick read through these threads</p>

<font color="#008000">Simon Davey from last night's meeting</font></p>

<font color="#008000">Simon Davey...</font></p>

to think 12 months since we worried about SD being poached by another club.</p>

I still feel we need to get some overall perspective, he wasn't Wenger then and he's not Spackman now.</p>

If things don't improve by say mid October then it may be time to re appraise.</p>

 

RE: Should they use the same criteria for sacking him as Ritchie?

Whether you agree with the criteria or not, one of the things Ritchie was sacked for was his ppg over the first 18 games of that particular season. I don't think using Davey's ppg over the first 6 games of this season would be very fair. Incidentally, his ppg up to the end of last season was way ahead of Ritchie's.

 

pontyender, you obviously like davey, which is your choice, but

what do you think he brings to the club. what qualities do you think he has

 

No it wasn't. You are trying to compare Ritchie's worst period

to Davey's overall period. Ritchies last 18 games have the same ppg as Davey's last 18. Ritchie had much the higher overall ppg.

 

RE: pontyender, you obviously like davey, which is your choice, but

I don't particularly like him and do my fair share of criticising him. I just think quite a few on here have been after him from day one because he was seen as the cheap option and wasn't a 'name'. I also don't think it's fair to judge his tilt at this season until he has a fully fit and match sharp squad to choose from.

 

RE: No it wasn't. You are trying to compare Ritchie's worst period

The only period of Ritchie's that can be compared is his 18 games in the Championship.

 

RE: No it wasn't. You are trying to compare Ritchie's worst period

'Ritchies last 18 games have the same ppg as Davey's last 18.'

Even if we look at it like that, it would read as follows:

Last 18 League games:

Ritchie 15 pts (0.83 ppg)

Davey 17 pts (0.94 ppg)</p>

So no, they haven't got the same ppg.</p>

 

WE ARE THE BOARD........ RESISTANCE IS FUTILE,............. YOU WILL BE ASSIMILATED.................... WE ARE THE BOARD

 

Sneaky, ignoring the two competitive cup defeats that we have suffered under Davey

ie Cardiff and Crewe. The last 18 competitive games for davey gives 0.833ppg based on three points for a win and one for a draw.

 

Well said

I couldn't agree more, we all deal in extremes when the truth is usually somewhere in the middle

 

RE: Sneaky, ignoring the two competitive cup defeats that we have suffered under Davey

Since when have you got points for cup games?

 

I thought Richie was sacked for refusing to bring in new players? nt

 

They are just as competitive as any other game and just as important

And if you look at Paul.d's managers stats for all past barnsley fc maangers then every game is adjusted to be worth 3 points regardless of whether the season was actually only 2 points per game or if it was a cup game.