most reports of the Hull match quoted defensive errors as the reason for our 1st two goals-what they failed to say was that they were FORCED errors</p> In both cases the forwards put the defenders under pressure causing doubt and the end result was two excellent goals</p> Let's have more of the same until May 7th</p>
Plus both goals still needed a considerable burst of pace to beat the defenders I.e. if it had have been Nardi, he'd have got nowhere near it- defensive errors or not.
RE: Plus both goals still needed a considerable burst of pace to beat the defenders Oh no, forgotten. Istvan showed us what we have been missing for ages: A quality "big man". His movement, control, pace and finishing were things Rico could only dream of.
Southampton- I'll give him- BUT he beat the offside trap there When he beats the offside trap- Nardi can get behind the last man and get his shot off. He's already through there see.</p> Its when he has to run for a ball and get there first that he shows his weakness. If its a 50/50 ball he generally can't be arsed.</p> Those first two on Satdi, Pete and Steve still had work to do. My guess is that Nardi wouldn't have scored either</p>
and just think.................... as scorer of the goal Nardy would have started instead of Peter if he hadn't been booked-great bit of refereeing
I've been a bit unfair on Nardi The first goal is the type he's score- just watched it again. Long ball, lucky deflection and follows up to score.</p> Second one- he'd never have chased it so I stand by that one.</p> And I don't remember him heading a goal, not reacently anyroad. So he'd not have got the third.</p> So yeah, nice one Mr Thorpe from Suffolk </p>
maybe? Am not 100% certain to be honest becaue i know he misses a few chances but to me that is down to form and confidence rather than ability, at least he gets in the right position to miss which is a start!
