Did anyone just watch the various replays of the 2nd penalty on Sky and think...

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by BFCFan4Life, Nov 10, 2009.

  1. BFC

    BFCFan4Life Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    5,523
    Likes Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Halifax
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    that there's actually no/very minimal contact at all?
     
    BFCFan4Life, Nov 10, 2009
    #1
  2. pau

    paul.d Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    12,910
    Likes Received:
    758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Hamill was looking straight ahead-no intention at all just a tangle of legs

    oh for video replays
     
    paul.d, Nov 10, 2009
    #2
  3. Idi

    Idioteque1988 Active Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2008
    Messages:
    174
    Likes Received:
    235
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    North Ferriby
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Yup, very minimal contact. Although it was a penalty, Hammill shouldn't have gone in as he did, played right into their diving cheating hands. First one wasn't though, Steele gets the ball, and that is who the ref gave the foul against...
     
    Idioteque1988, Nov 10, 2009
    #3
  4. North Yorks Red

    North Yorks Red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    16,708
    Likes Received:
    14,743
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Harrogate
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    What got me...

    is cant remember the last time that I so a ref give two really dodgy penalties like that in one match usually if they award on thats iffy they would only give another if it was a stonewall certainty
     
    North Yorks Red, Nov 10, 2009
    #4

Share This Page