No I mean playing 90 minutes not the last 5 minutes when we are in trouble. There must be question over his fitness or ability. Or is it the fact that Andy Ritchie is not aware of his ability.
Simple answer: Because he's ****. I have no idea why our fans shout his name & treat him like a messiah. He's an injury prone, spacky backed, work shy loser. And a question for you: Andy Ritchie was a better striker than all our forwards added together - so if Nardy is such a genius ... don't you think Andy would spot that & play him?
RE: Simple answer: Opinions fella. However, Nardiello is a striker on BFC's books. The other strikers are **** poor, so he deserves his chance. And I dont mean one game. Hayes has had all season in the 1st team and proven he is not a championship player - there were doubts about his ability in division one.
Yes. Get Nardy in the side. When he limps off after 11 minutes, not to be seen again for 3 months, we'll then go back to Richards & Hayes. Don't get me wrong - I fully agree that we need a striker. As well as a left back, centre half & chairman. Nardy, the messiah, is not the solution. By the way - Paul Hayes is one of the few players in our squad with genuine Championship class. If he could make himself stonger than a 6 year old girl he'd be a world beater.
So is Nardy actually **** or just injury prone? I agree he's had more than his fair share of injuries, but reluctant to agree he's ****. Especially since I paid £100 for a signed shirt.
RE: So is Nardy actually **** He's the best finisher at the club by roughly 8.7 million miles. But you'll get 10 games per season from him. He's not what we need.
Nope. Two now. Two in January. One in March. Five in April (4 goals scored) when we're already down & it makes no difference. We just don't learn. It's like Groundhog Day.