England question,how many do they need to win by

by to become odi WN1,s?

 

Gobbledygook. Graham Gooch. Ulrika-ka-ka-ka.

 

Can't do it this game - we need to make up 8 points in the rankings (to Australia). I think a 5-0 whitewash will just do it.

 

but brunner can understand. so its not me with the problem.

 

thanks, that'll be hard to do but give them 12 month and i think they will get it.

 

What does 'WN1,s' mean?

 

World number one

 

So it's my problem is it?

You constantly post threads that are difficult to read/decipher/understand. You have often acknowledged this in the past, and despite numerous users of the forum attempting to offer advice and assist you in your postings, you continue down this pathetic road. So either you're too stubborn to change, or you know exactly what you're doing.

 

Correct, 5-0 whitewash would do it.

 

I like em its like doing a cryptic crossword or at least attempting one.

 

bloody hell. In that case then it really is you with the problem with the English language. I'd have never have worked out that you was trying to say world number one just because you put WN1, I thought it was part of a postcode or something.

 

But someone did get it, and answered the question.

 

If I walked into Barnsley town centre and decided to communicate by attempting some form of tic-tac hand signals then I reckon one person might be able to understand what I was saying, it wouldn't make me any less of an idiot for thinking it was normal though.

 

You just don't get *it do you?

*anything

 

In all fairness to him...

The question was aimed at cricket fans, and as a cricket fan it took me a split second to understand the question.

Some folk'll just have a go at him for nowt.

 

Bang on Merlin, on a couple off occasions I have critcised Hemmsie for his style of posting, it doesn't matter how old he is, how immature he is, there is no excuse for posting in a style that very few people understand, other than to say that it is a form of arrogance and ignorance rolled into one and to justify it by saying that because one person out of many understood what he meant is just plain stupidity.

 

Re: In all fairness to him...

I'm a cricket fan, and tbh, I did work it out after a few attempts (what he meant). But the point stands, and never have I ever had a go at anyone on this forum just for the sake of it. Not under this username, or my previous one (Whitey).

The lad could have typed 'World Number One' and saved any resulting aggro etc.

But yeah, I had a go at him for nowt...

 

Thanks, mate.

I like Hemsworth as a contributor to the forum. He's unique, and does create debate (kind of). But I stand my previous comments - his posts are often hard to decipher.

 

Me too; I thought the rest of the post made it pretty obvious.