Just being released now. Public domain so it’s gonna get discussed. But obviously don’t post anything that could be litigious.
Marc last night: Can we please keep this thread to the darts final? The other track is horrible and unnecessary. Cheers. Marc less than 3 hours later: Just being released now. Public domain so it’s gonna get discussed. But obviously don’t post anything that could be litigious. One is shut down by admin, the other is given the go ahead by the same guy. Piss funny
Not seen the darts thing unless it is comments about his girlfriend. Re this thread, I think it is fair for him to pre-empt it and say can be discussed but just not posting libellous stuff i.e. calling someone named on the list a nonce etc etc.
Only bit that confuses me a little about today's reporting is 'Prince' Andrew in the headlines. Thought that was already known / fact / public domain etc. Was thinking today was going to be for the outing of other names.
Seems not a lot of new information is being revelead. As its been released as part of the Maxwell defence , then would be surprised if their was as isnt she trying to prove she wasnt party to anything?
Totally different tbf. Nothing was 'shut down by admin'. Nothing was removed, nothing was locked. I made a polite request to keep a thread topic to the topic, because of where it was heading. This is a completely different thread, about a news item in the public domain. If you want to start a new thread about your distaste for people having older girlfriends, go for it. I guarantee you it will be treated like any other thread. As far as this thread goes, if no one is interested it won't get discussed and will slip out of sight, like many other threads. That's all I'll say on it, cheers.
Yeah, seems like the release 'contains no new bombshell revelation', to quote the BBC, and it's actually just a combination of people who already agreed to their names being included (witnesses etc), names where there is no suggestion of wrongdoing, and others already publicly named through the criminal case.
Looking down the list some obvious names, Clinton, Trump, Jackson but got taken by surprise by Hawkin, wouldn't want to catch sight of him getting noshed off, urgghhh.
I don't imagine so, but surely you can understand why it would be pretty unwanted by most people for a thread about darts to turn into a discussion on the grey areas of statutory rape?
Putting aside the fact there's no evidence to suggest it happened, are you saying the worst part about hypothetically witnessing Stephen Hawking having sex with trafficked women would be the fact that he was disabled?
