FAO Siteadmin

Thought i'd ask before i post</p>

Sorry if not, just wondered, I see people wanted to see Eduardo challenge, I have the video here, wanted to know if i could post it or not, sorry if i can't.</p>

 

people can see it youtube anyway

 

Youtube have banned it,

 

RE: FAO Siteadmin - another request

Can you remove the pile of **** symbol ( /poo ) I'm sick of seeing it? Thanks.

 

is that not a bee-hive anyway ;-)

 

Can we also have the word 'fact' changed to I'm a ******.

 

What they banned it for? nt

 

RE: What they banned it for? nt

No idea. sorry</p>

I went on to have a look, and on them all it says Youtube have removed this video.</p>

 

Get it shown lad, i think we should see it, it'll be shown on MOD anyways, lets have a look at it....

 

I will Stevie, just asked because i didnt want to get banned for posting it if i didnt know if i could</p>

http://www.d1g.com/video/show/1811652</p>

 

Ouch. That's an horrific challenge. But he apologises, so it's all right.

 

You won't get banned for that love nt

 

RE: You won't get banned for that love nt

Oh right, thanks very much Cazi, just wanted to make sure before i posted.

 

Whooosshhhhhh....Bad tackle for sure....But in the old days etc.... (blagger) ....

Career might have gone apparently for the poor lad, sad if true....

 

Nothing worse than I've seen go unpunished many times at oakwell

Unfortunate that the player got injured but if he had got up without an injury like howard for example has many times then the challenge would probably not have been mentioned again.

To be fair, he slid in while Eduardo stilll had the ball and it was only passed away at the last second, unlike challenges that we see regularly where the ball has been gone 5 seconds before the player even starts to 'tackle'

 

Not suggesting there was intent mate, but it is a bad tackle. Studs up and diving in - the ability to tackle while remaining standing seems to be a dying art.

 

It is a bad tackle, I agree, but I think that the resulting injury is swaying peoples opinion on the dirtyness of the tackle when in actual fact it is just very unfortunate.

In any case I think that the blame lies squarely at the feet of referees up and down the country who bottle it week in, week out and allow bad challenges to go unpunished, which leads players to start thinking it is acceptable and before we know it they're all jumping in (still going unpunished by the blind men in the middle) then as soon as one of these accepted challenges causes a serious injury the player is crucified.