Few points regarding England game

1. We didnt need Hargreaves, we were playing Andora. But when we play a decent team we should play Gerrard in an attacking role next to Hargreaves. Best midfielder in the world, may aswell play him in his optimum position.

2. David Platt defines the word idiot "Andora will class a 1-0 loss as a victory". Yes im sure their manager would agree.

3. Beckham should teach Lennon and Downing how to cross a ball. But hed be wasting his time cos' Rooney/Johnson cant head anyway. We played better when we played narrow.

4. Why come out at half time and start playing at a high tempo? should have been from the off.

5. Team for tonight:

Robinson
Richards
Ferdinand
Terry
Cole
Beckham
Gerrard
Carrick
Lennon
Rooney
Defoe

6. Andora reminded me of the sunday league team who couldnt play football, but were decent at fighting.

 

2. David Platt defines the word idiot "Andora will class a 1-0 loss as a victory". Yes im sure their manager would agree.

3. Beckham should teach Lennon and Downing how to cross a ball. But hed be wasting his time cos' Rooney/Johnson cant head anyway. We played better when we played narrow.
</p>

Just thought I'd raise the comparison between points 2 &amp; 3.</p>

 

1. true</p>

2. Im sure Andorra would have taken a 1-0 loss going into the game</p>

3. Not really lennon game to cross the Beckham style, and Joe cole back on the left soon we hope but i do see your point.</p>

4. Well yes it should but once they got to half time i am glad they did.</p>

5. So seen as how you class Downing as not good enough what in the hell do you pick Rooney for? He has been shambolic and should have certainly been on the bench last night
</p>

 

Like the team - not sure about Carrick though. nt