Finally, a response from the F.A to my email on considering my position as a ref

Thank you for taking the time to contact us expressing your feelings surrounding the challenge by Morgan of Sheffield United and the FA response to the enquiry.

What I must point out to you is that although the board of enquiry comes under the heading and control of the FA the personnel involved are completely independent of the FA to ensure the FA cannot be accused of bias or favouritism. The people who make up the board are former players and managers who in the TV speak know more about the game of football than people outside of the game.

You are free to consider you position of course however please do not use the FA as the reason for this as the FA is simply the managers of the process.

I wish you luck in the future

 

Basically thanks but **** off if ur gonna try and blame us!!

 

i hope you're responding on their poor grammar nt

 

What a poor reply/carry on

Surely, the FA are ultimately responsible for everything that comes under the umberella of their juristriction. irrespective of who they appoint astheir puppets, or in this case Muppetts.

 

Not only an appalling sentiment, but also full of piss-poor grammar. Uneducated, ignorant, illiterate buffoons. Shame on them.

 

"know more about the game of football than people outside of the game. "

Where've I heard that before...???

 

Is Gordon Shepherd on the panel?

 

A-Holes

They are determined to do absolutely nothing. They have the power to do almost anything, remember the game is administered by The FA.

 

Yes.

FA Statement:

"In light of the events at Oakwell during the match between Barnsley & Sheffield United, the FA would like to state that an Airdale Terrier has decided that fighter jets should be sent to Blackpool Tower. This was decided by people inside the game. These finding took us 11 minutes to decide & cost us thertehsix pence. My underpants are made from Brie. Thank you."

 

Can I suggest you forward your email and this response to someo f the national media to see what they think of the reply. I think the Times would be a good start.