FL Response - Re: SWFC

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by pontyender, Apr 15, 2008.

  1. pon

    pontyender Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    10,784
    Likes Received:
    3,909
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Barnsley
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Seems they are not really bothered about enforcing the 5 loan players in squad of 16 rule then!

    The underlying principle of the Regulation is that a majority of the fielded players (i.e. 6 out of 11) should be permanently registered with the Club. The Regulation was drafted to be a maximum of 5 loan players out of 16 (as opposed to 5 out of 11) so as to remove the risk that a manager may inadvertenly utilise a loan player as a substitute and during the match go from 5 to 6 loan players on the field.

    Only four loan players actually played in the match and because Showumni replaced Sahar, no more than 3 were on the field at any time.

    Thank you for contacting The Football League with your view.

    Patricia Brown
    Customer Services
    The Football League
    www.football-league.co.uk
     
  2. EastStander

    EastStander Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    29,883
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Upper tier, Gangway 11
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Ridiculous! Having those loan players on the bench potentially gives them an advantage as the manager has those options available to him, even if he doesn't use more than 5 on the field!
     
  3. The Mannster

    The Mannster New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    2,105
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Kuala Lumpur
    Home Page:
    The opportunity was there for Laws to use those players though. Pffft.
     
  4. t.t

    t.t Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2006
    Messages:
    1,732
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    The thing that got me...

    Was that Stoke had to remove one of their loan players from the squad so not to break the rule.
     
  5. Farnham_Red

    Farnham_Red Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    34,499
    Likes Received:
    23,941
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Farnham
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Maybe we should play with 6 subs tonight

    Then we can have 5 outfield players and a goalie

    wont use them all so no harm done eh
     
  6. Che

    Chef Tyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    19,714
    Likes Received:
    12,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    West Stand Bogs
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley
    agree. makes a mockery of having the rule.
     
  7. SuperTyke

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    55,742
    Likes Received:
    29,885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Marvellous

    So what they are saying is that EVERY sub can be a loan player, you can have 10 out of 16 all loanees and provided that only 5 of them actually enter the field of play it is ok.
     
  8. juttyp

    juttyp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    3,070
    Likes Received:
    605
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Member of the 135 club !
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    What a cop out

    Load of ******, wonder what stoke have to say about it?</p>
     

Share This Page