So if they "dont know nothing", then they must know something. Bloody hell, me criticising people about English! Pot, kettle and all that...
Good job I checked the replies... I was about to point that one out. Me thinks he's lost the argument already.
RE: bet me to it Those of you who don't think that Dirk isn't not the smallest frottermeister who doesn't exist can all not go and don't get fecked.
RE: bet me to it No, it isn't what you never said that wouldn't happen if he didn't not say it can't.
Not a particular fan of Shuker - but I do wonder if Ritchie got it wrong on Saturday. Whilst I can't understand exactly why so many fans on here get on Shuker's back, it's worth pointing out that whenever he's on the pitch, he invariably attracts the attention of at least two opposition players to mark him. This is mainly because of the way he plays I guess, running at defences and worrying them. OK, his crossing may be inconsistent (non-existent some will say!) but the opposition cannot take the risk he'll NEVER get in a decent cross or do some damage in their area. So having said that, and acknowledging that our defence ain't the strongest in the division - starting with Shuker at Layer Road may have paid dividends insofar as attack is the best form of defence. I can see why Ritchie went with Reid (to combat the height of Iwelumo) - but the resultant 'attack-defficient' midfield didn't help relieve the pressure on our back 4. It was noticeable that when Shuker did come on for the final 25 minutes or so there was some change in emphasis on the team's tactics - although it had little effect on the final outcome, I grant you!