I'll keep this brief. Just put the telly on waiting for something else, and a programme about Paul Gascoine is on. The gutter press have admitted they knew which pub he'd be at as they hacked his phone. Piers Morgan the ******* cuntiest of cúnt$, basically saying "well, it sells newspapers". How can THAT man ever work for a paper, or be on television EVER ... and I say this before linking to this article. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2...n-compares-himself-nelson-mandela-free-speech Strip him of all his money Strip him of all his power Strip him of all his possessions and kick the lovely person in the ********. He's actually evil. I know he's done far worse, but this really annoyed me. Rebbecca Brookes is on now. She can go **** herself as well.
It was an old clip. At the end of the second episode it says Piers turned down being interviewed. He's been close to Gazza for decades and gave him so big interviews on different shows. The two of them get on well.
He's deflecting the blame though, in one breath blaming the BBC for slagging off the tabloids, and then saying he's been friends with Paul for 30 years and bragging he said for some of the guys treatment. The simple question is, did he hack, authorise the hack or know of the hacking of ANY person whilst in a position of power. If the answer is yes, he shouldn't be in our lives (whether it be writing articles, or been seen as some kind of celebrity). If the (honest) answer is no, then he's incompetent and doesn't deserve to be in the public eye. Basically, what I am saying is, he is a thundercunt.
He is a nob. But I do hope Gazza has (it seems to) forgiven him and moved on. No point in holding grudges, especially with so many struggles in his personal life. And fair play to Morgan for helping him with rehab if that's true* * = fair play being on whether Morgan has changed his nasty ways... Not watched him for ages, or read anything about him, so I have no clue. Just know he's got a job in America now
I think he's been a controversial Mary for the sake of it a lot of the time. It gets him his fame, which I think he should be deprived of.
I used to agree with him on some stuff. I wasn't aware of all his past (I'm only a bairn ) . And I'm a forgiving type. But when you read some of the stuff he conjured up to sell papers is horrendous. It's disgraceful. I'm all for people having a second chance, but takes the micky when he's still on millions a year when it's obvious he's still devious... chance after chance. Obviously he doesn't see anything he's doing as wrong, maybe sees it as immoral but so do alot of celebrity/news types. Doesn't particularly paint a colourful picture of our journalists, does he?
Just to add a bit more... The people who authorised / knew about that all want sacking, no second chance, no publicity, their careers over. Simple as that.
