get the torches lit, the BBs has decreed Kate McCann guilty

Just like they did that poor sod when those prostitutes were murdered and it turned out to be someone else.</p>

We love it.</p>

 

Yes.

Kate McCann.
KM.
Killed Maddie.

That's how they worked it out.
With a weegie board.

Let Columbo loose on it.
In fact - you look just like Columbo, same height & everything.

Weird.

 

Bandwagon jumping is great , whether it be football or justice

.

 

Souza is the new Beckenbauer, Kate McCann killed her daughter

Easy innit.</p>

 

Same mac

flashtastic.

 

Hartog has a revelation



In another 10 years, spitting image.

 

Whilst it wouldn't suprise me if she was involved purely on the basis that most crimes against children are commited by their immediate family, I think it is far too early to 'light the torches'. </p>

If she hasn't done anything, then this must be a torturous ordeal to have to suffer to an already traumatised person.</p>

If she has done something then the truth has to come out.</p>

I hope it's the former, as if it is the later even if it is as a result of covering up an accident or a lash out on impulse, she or they will be absolutely crucified by the tabloids NOT only because of the crime but mainly because the tabloids championed their cause.</p>

Unfortunetly I feel that now she has been named as a suspect the limited objectivity of the 'general public' will have gone right out the window.</p>

</p>

</p>

</p>

 

I now feel sadistic after chuckling at that post

I'm going to lay down.

 

You cant go against the mob.

.

 

Thinking on! Havent our press already tried and convicted some bloke

already with regards to this case?

 

'you are all individuals'

crowd ' yes we are all individuals'</p>

lone voice 'I'm not'</p>

 

That's exactly how he sits in the Ponty End.

When we're winning 4-0.

The miserable owd fecker.

 

Yes.

It's Paul Reid's fault, or summat.

Have I got my wires crossed again?

 

He's got the Munkon Syndrome nt

 

Oh aye?

When was the last time we were winning 4-0?

 

aye, and if he turns out to be innocent, they'll issue an apology...

...on page 15, an eighth of a column. Like this:</p>

We still think we're right but to Mr Bloggs</p>

<font size="1">we're sorry. </font></p>

<font size="1">Disclaimer... any reference to sorry does not mean sorry for legal purposes any inference you may read into the word sorry is purely at your own risk and will not be admissable in a court of law for libel puposes.</font></p>

 

1831.

Half past six.

I don't know.
I'm not Paul Deacon, am I.

Square root divided by the hypotenuse of the nickynackynoo.

 

Now that is a ham sandwich..

.. monitor moment.

 

It's so long ago

I don't think it's ever happened.

 

Peterboro at home ?

the day publicity pete was ousted?</p>