Hang on a mo - how come Reid gets a second yellow and Rankin doesn't?

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by Cazi, Aug 27, 2005.

  1. Caz

    Cazi New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    Messages:
    13,133
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    A completely different planet to everybody else
    Home Page:
    #1 Cazi, Aug 27, 2005
     
  2. Farnham_Red

    Farnham_Red Administrator
    Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    34,499
    Likes Received:
    23,941
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Farnham
    Style:
    Barnsley
    #2 Farnham_Red, Aug 27, 2005
    Ref has been crap thats why
     
  3. Gue

    Guest Guest

    #3 Guest, Aug 27, 2005
    Maybe Reid's yellow was more obvious than Rankine's? I don't know.
     
  4. Gue

    Guest Guest

    #4 Guest, Aug 27, 2005
    nope, rankins was very obvious
     
  5. Googs

    Googs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2005
    Messages:
    8,475
    Likes Received:
    383
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Wilthorpe
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    #5 Googs, Aug 27, 2005
    Exactly what I thought Cazi.

    A cynical trip when already on a yellow goes unpunished, yet the ref so late in the game decides a meaningless handball is enough to warrant a second yellow. Useless ****** referee.

    Also gave them a free kick in their own penalty area when it was our player who was tripped.
     
  6. sus

    susietyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    1,879
    Likes Received:
    163
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    on tour in League 1
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    #6 susietyke, Aug 27, 2005
    rankins second handball was completely overlooked

    and instead he booked reid (no idea what for), obviously took a dislike the him!
     
  7. Vic

    Vicar Tyke Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    483
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Heaven on earth
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    #7 Vicar Tyke, Aug 27, 2005
    Because the Ref was f***ing terrible

    and gave nothing to the Reds!
     
  8. Journo Tyke

    Journo Tyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    14,077
    Likes Received:
    1,164
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Mortgage and Protection Advisor
    Location:
    People's republic of Yorkshire
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    #8 Journo Tyke, Aug 27, 2005
    RE: Exactly what I thought Cazi.

    He should have been off already... deserved 3 bookings today.
     
  9. Gud

    GudjonFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    4,615
    Likes Received:
    405
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    The Sanctuary of the 18 Yard Line
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    #9 GudjonFan, Aug 27, 2005
    Wasn't it right in front of the dugout as well?

    That normally spells trouble in itself.

    Had Ranks' (second) offense occured after the dimissal of Reid, would the ref have acted differently.
     
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)

Share This Page