<div class="ReadMsgBody BorderTop" id="readMsgBodyContainer"><div class="ExternalClass" id="MsgContainer"><table class="EC_MsoNormalTable" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="98%" border="0"><tbody><tr><td style="padding-right: 0cm; padding-left: 0cm; padding-bottom: 0cm; padding-top: 0cm"><div><table class="EC_MsoNormalTable" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="506" border="0"><tbody><tr><td style="padding-right: 0cm; padding-left: 0cm; background: #99a154; padding-bottom: 0cm; width: 675px; padding-top: 0cm" bgcolor="#99a154"><p align="center"><span class="EC_MsoHyperlink"><font color="#0068cf">If you are having trouble viewing this email, click here</font></span></p></td></tr><tr><td style="padding-right: 0cm; padding-left: 0cm; padding-bottom: 0cm; padding-top: 0cm"><font face="Tahoma" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt"><font color="#0068cf"></font> </span></font><h3><font face="Tahoma" color="#869146" size="4">For all those that want to stop animal cruelty in our society, <u>I cannot emphasise enough how important it is that hunting remains illegal.</u> </font></h3><font face="Tahoma" size="2">The Hunting Act, which makes it illegal to hunt wild animals with packs of dogs for sport, hangs by a thread. Several leading MPs and many candidates standing for election have stated that, if they win at the next General Election, they will vote to repeal this precious, hard-won piece of legislation after holding a free vote in the Commons. </font> <font face="Tahoma" size="2">The League used peaceful campaigning to gain the Act in 2004 and now as I write, we are marshalling every resource at our disposal to defend it. We are about to launch our Campaign, designed to let every voter, MP and candidate in the land know that 75% of the British public believe hunting should remain illegal. </font></p> <font face="Tahoma" size="2">If, today, you can take a minute to <font color="#0068cf">give whatever you can afford towards our campaign</font>, you will help us stave off this very real threat to the peace of our countryside and the safety of its wild animals. Every penny counts in our fight to keep the Hunting Act. </font></p> <font face="Tahoma" size="2"></font></p> <font face="Tahoma" size="2">Yours sincerely, </font></p> <font face="Tahoma" size="2">Joshua Kaile </font><font face="Tahoma" size="2">Election Campaign Manager </font></p> <font face="Tahoma" size="2">PS. We’re looking forward to updating you on the progress of the campaign.</font> </p> </p></td></tr><tr style="height: 122px"><td style="padding-right: 0cm; padding-left: 0cm; background: #707940; padding-bottom: 0cm; padding-top: 0cm; height: 122px" valign="bottom" bgcolor="#707940"><font face="Tahoma" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt"></span></font></td></tr><tr><td style="padding-right: 0cm; padding-left: 0cm; background: #707940; padding-bottom: 0cm; padding-top: 0cm" bgcolor="#707940"><p align="center"><font face="Tahoma" color="#ffffff" size="1"><span style="font-size: 9pt">New Sparling House, Holloway Hill, Godalming, Surrey GU7 1QZ. Tel: 01483 524250. <font face="Tahoma">Web:<font color="#0068cf">www.league.org.uk</font> E-mail</font></span></font></p></td></tr></tbody></table></div></td></tr></tbody></table></div></div>
I just think the rules need to be changed a bit.</p> "Hunting" should involve wrestling a Grizzly bollock-naked with no defensive armaments. </p> Let see how many of the blue blood b@stards carry on then... </p>
aye its about time the ban was lifted and all the pompus do gooders go back to knitting of felching foxes
Paul Weller once wrote something on the back of one of a single that summed up the hypocrisy of hunting.
How can they call it 'sport'? There has to be some sort of competition element for it to be a sport, the fox doesn't have a chance. W@nkers. There is a lass at work that is involved in it, I kind of stopped talking to her when I found out, it just changed my impression of her, and I told her so. She reckons it still goes on regardless of the law.
Gin Trap Found one the other day with a squirrel with its foot caught,what a horrible way to die. "A death for no reason its murder"
about time no I'm not blue-blooded obviously nor I have I been anywhere near a fox hunt, grouse shoot or any blood sports but it always seemed to me like interference just for the sake of it by goody-goodies often living outside communities not involved in hunting and with no appreciation of its importance therein. Also foxes are vermin and there is no reason to protect them. Furthermore they are still allowed to be shot at the end of a foxhunt now so you might as well let them carry on as normal instead of this half-measure that pleases neither side. fox-hunting is a British tradition and I have absolutely no objection to it and think it very possible that if (when?) the tories win the next election they will have a majority in favour of it. I'm not a tory either just to avoid additional abuse after my views on foxhunting I just think they will probably win and this is something they are likely to do; there are two sides to every arguement and I'm just putting mine across.
ah that old chestnut tradition. lets go back to bear fighting, badger baiting and the lord of the manor having his wicked way with newlywed brides on their wedding night. nice. as for being an outsider, lets allow paedos a free reign, after all i'm too old for them to be interested in me so leave 'em to it, eh?
Well said Knowlesy...nothing more annoying than do gooders who do more harm than good.......go and moan about something worth moaning about...all you Mary Whitehouse types....
You're labouring under the misconception (amongst others)... </p> ...that foxhunting keeps the numbers down when the fact is that the hunts actively encourage their breeding</p>
Never ceases to amaze. </p> The ill-informed, moronicballocks that hunt supporters come out with.</p>
Spot On Why some people believe they have a right to inflict pain and suffering for their own sick gratification is beyond me. But if they really think like that, why don't they just say so instead of inventing all sorts of lies in a pathetic attempt to justify their depraved activities?
RE: Never ceases to amaze. I am not ill-informed I completely understand your arguement and after a reasoned judgement I have come to a different conclusion to that of yourself and others, although there are those throughout the country who a similar way of thinking to my own; I wouldn't however judge someone because they held a different view to me, and as such I was simply pointing out the other side of the arguement, . indeed without swearing
You misunderstand. </p> My "judgement" was not of you but of the ill-informed moronic ballocks you're coming out with and, as such, is perfectly valid.</p>
Having read what you have to say... </p> ...I don't give a flying **** whether you respect my views or not.</p> So ballocks.</p>