huntly in Pinderfields......

FECKIN (

don't know if that was an accident, they wouldn't say yesterday, but just been blurted out on Calendar

 

Should be rotting in hell .............

.... or hanging from a street lamp in Soham

 

Nope, should be in prison - clearly he doesn't want to be there...

...but wants to be dead hence the suicide attempts. Why give him what he wants?

 

Cos I don't want to fund the scumbags life .....

... for the next 30 years, and he doesn't want to die, he's just playing at it for whatever reason, attention, comfy bed in Pindefields, better food etc.

The cowardly animal deserves to die a slow painful death, crucify the b*stard publicly and see if he likes that

 

RE: Cos I don't want to fund the scumbags life .....

It's the cowards way out. If he is aware of what he has done and is with us enough to regret any of it or at least relive any of it, the mental suffering he will have over the rest of his life is worth every penny

 

But he won't be suffering will he? .......

..... I don't want to re-open the 'death penalty' debate but I'm sorry, the likes of Huntley, Hindley, Sutcliffe etc., where there is 100% certainty of their guilt, have no place on this earth.

I still maintain that none of these people want to die, after all prison life is better than no life at all, so for me they should be put to their deaths. That way, they can feel how their victims felt 5 mins before their lives were ended by these beasts.

 

You forgot to mention Shipman...

...where the families of the victims were furious he had been allowed to commit suicide and escape the fate decided for him - something David Blunkett failed to grasp.

One of the (many) reasons I don't agree with the death penalty is that it prevents these people from reflecting on and, hopefully, suffering some remorse or guilt at the crimes they've committed.

 

RE: You forgot to mention Shipman...

Kill them and get on with your life, don't go spending millions on them in the vain hope they are suffering.

 

On the plus side

Shipman's post-mortem found traces of spunk in his arse. ahem allegedly.

 

RE: But he won't be suffering will he? .......

State sponsored murder is wrong. I do not believe that these animals should have easy lives, but where they can remember what they have done and have to suffer the mental consequences of their actions then they should do so. Knowing they will suffer for the rest of their natural days is better than five minutes of pain

 

RE: But he won't be suffering will he? .......

Whats so wrong with state sponsored murder?

Is it any better than state sponsored torture or state sponsored imprisonment?

 

I work at Pinderfields...

He's currently in I.C.U just down the corridor, two policemen guarding the doorway checking everyone's I.D. Camera crews outside and quite a few news vans with their sats rigged up outside. Very little security about considering who's in, l've worked here 8 years and we have had in Huntley before, Whiting and the Ripper. When Whiting came we had armed response vehicles and armed police guarding the entrances, police on horseback around the grounds, helicopter above. Two policemen on the door seems very little security for a maximum category prisoner here.

 

Best mass murderer poll:

Dennis Nielsen. no contest.

 

Hitler

 

RE: But he won't be suffering will he? .......

no better than state sponsored torture and worse than imprisonment.

The death penalty does not work

 

i quite liked Shipman

at least he didn't just copy all the other so called serial killers and invented his new style of murdering.

he is the Radiohead of murdering

 

That must make

Fred West the Robbie Williams of death making. I think.

 

Fred & Rose

Robbie &amp; Kylie ?</p>



'Doing it for the kids'</p>

 

was on national news yesterday.

 

RE: But he won't be suffering will he? .......

they die, of course it works