Cant fault them for using the throws to their advantage, even the long ball game I can handle. But it's how dirty they are that irritates me. You can still be a physical side and be successful, like Big Sam's Bolton.</p> Shawcross and Fuller are wánkers. </p>
Agreed **** team & **** fans. We nearly stayed in the Premiership[ playing football. They will stay up playing anti-footbal; horrid. They are Howard Wilkinson's wet dream. POMO - toss
I just dont like them because we were ripped off against them at home last year, we should have beat them away, and they blamed us for not getting to the play-offs the year before because aparently we fielded a 2nd string team in a 7-0 defeat to WBA, when we only had 2 or 3 2nd string players
Thirded Hull and WBA havent resorted to playing that sort of football - if you can call it that - and are holding their own I hope Stoke come straight back down - only problem with that is we will have to play them again next season (Problably - but only 7 points off playoffs so...) Quite probably taken 2 of Arsenals best players out of action for some weeks with crude deliberate assaults
Yes there is always that as well. Although I didn't want my bias to cloud my judgment of them, I was prepared to give them an inch this season. I just think that for Pulis to get a winning side he thinks he has to resort to thug-tactics. I don't remember his playing days but at a guess he was quite aggressive on the pitch. And as Eaststander says below, Cresswell can be added to the list of wánkers along with Fuller, Shawcross and Pulis.