I know Ritchie has gone but...

Do you think we would have taken 6 points from two piss poor sides if he was still here?</p>

Just a thought like.</p>

 

not at all...........and did richards play last night? or wasit a mirage?

temp manager ahs done excellent so far, considering he mainly had AR's boys to use, especially as we havent conceded in the last two games

 

Honestly

yes becasue southend looked poor defensively and Ipswhcih struggled as soon as we brought on a natural winger!!

 

Obviously...

taking into account the 4 extra players that the chairman signed.

 

RE: Honestly

b*ll$cks

 

Richards did play yes, if you were there he was the one who was holding it up pretty well at times!!!!!

 

and doing exactly what with it?

 

Laid it out wide a few times, attempted to get a couple of them into Knight.

 

FFS

he linked very well with Knight to lay on the first goal-so yes he did play!

 

and your point is.........................
he ahs still cost us more games this season, never looked like scoring last nite, as strikers are supposed to, so.............................

 

Think you will find it's more than Richards finishing that's cost us this season!!!! Works pretty hard for the team and is probably the only striker that actually attempts to win the ball when in the air. You will find there are two types of striker. 1. Your 'out and out' goalscorer and 2. Your ball winners.

You one of the 'Nardiello,Nardiello,Nardiello' singers!!!?

 

lol, no not at all, but he hasnt been given a decent run in the team, when Richards has been misfiring. richards does lack pace which N doesnt, they both have they good/ bad points which have all been discussed on here recently, but i just think R's has let us down more than he has helped us this season............

 

RE: FFS

Richards confirmed last night that he is not good enough for this league, he would not jump for balls, his poaching skills in front of goal are non existent and apart from the pass to Howard he did nothing,The omovement in the first half where he had only very simply to pass it out wide to Hayes to score was absolutely diabolical from someone who is supposed to be a proffesional footballer, it was easiere for him to pass to his right with Hayes in acres of space, so what does Richardsdo???? he passes it to their defender FFS . get him loaned out and bring in Stevie Wonder.

 

Nardiello could be a good player if he put the effort in, which im afraid to say he rarely does. Look at Knight last night, looking for the ball, tracking back and generally making a nuscience of himself. You don't get that with Nardi.

 

i now refer you to the reply down the page. some of your comments i agree with,
but i will still maintain that richards has cost us, is not fast enough or good enough...............

 

We Wouldn't Have Won Both Under Ritchie.....

because we would have had the exact same team as the four that came in to make a difference wasn't coming under Ritchie.

 

I was a Richie man

But he's gone and if i was honest then i'd have said NO we wouldnt have got 6 points from the last 2 games.  As others have said Davey made Subs that made a difference to the game, when was the last time Andy did that Tel.   </p>

 

DB3k......

I agree. Under Ritchie (as much as I liked him) I think the rot had set in. We needed fresh impetus, and that is what Davey and the 4 new lads have brought. Ritchie wouldn't bring anyone in to freshen things up, even though he had loads of time. Im fully behind Davey and the job he has done so far.

 

fair enough

reasons?