I think they're the best partnership and have been used far too infrequently recently. Don't get me wrong, O'Grady and Scotland are good players, but as a pair I believe Harewood and Dagnall works the best. Erm, that's it.
Been saying the same for a few weeks. Not really sure why they were dropped to be honest. Scotland far better coming on for last 20 mins
So would I they were the partnership that got us started in Jan The Leeds game was where it all seemed to click and allowed the club to offer Flicker the job I'd start with them up front
I agree to a great extent, but would suggest there should be a role for Chris O'G too. The ball found him and stuck, down the left wing v Brighton and Watford. We do have to go for it tomorrow.
I'd go with O'Grady and Dagnall personally. Harewood's offered far too little when he's on the pitch since January for me - just shoots from ridiculous positions.
My thinking is your thinking, Paul. They play 3 at the back, so let's go man for man. Probably won't work, like. But I've seen enough of this defensive game of late to know it won't get us what's required, and that's 3 points. Up and at em. See you all at the game (slight exaggeration). Goodnight my fellow worriers. YOU BEAUTIFUL REDS.
O'Grady confirmed today that he should be playing upfront, and I hope he's playing upfront for us for the next couple of years. Another huge performance from him.